You are viewing this post: Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood Sc Barrister – Court Hearing Update And Verdict? Quick Answer
Are you looking for an answer to the topic “Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict“? We answer all your questions at the website Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com in category: Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com/digital-marketing. You will find the answer right below.
Keep Reading
Djokovic attorney Nick Wood, an SC attorney, argued to reconser the visa cancellation after an unfortunate typo.
Tennis pro Novic Djokovic was arrested after arriving in Australia. He is now struggling to stay in the country for his upcoming game.
He has now been locked up in an immigration hotel and has not been seen in public. The player was only given permission to visit his lawyers to attend the virtual hearings.
While lawyers and the Australian government argued over the case, the player struggled to stay in the country. He also has his upcoming game on the schedule.
Who Is Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister?
Nine-time Australian Open winner Djokovic went into the country; compete at the Australia Open on January 17. However, he has a hard time traveling there.
Who would have thought? The champion would remain in custody following a medical exemption to enter the country.
The player has hired four lawyers, Nick Wood, Paul Holdenson, Jim Hartley and Nikola Dragojlovic. As one of the lawyers, Nick took care of Djokovic’s stay in Australia.
He advocated making an exception to the case of the player’s Visa cancellation due to a typo. He also made statements in court about the Biosecurity Act.
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood- Court Hearing Update
The court hearing has begun to raise concerns about the treatment of nine-time Australian Open winners. The player’s lawyer has mentioned what else he could have done for his stay in the country.
Until now, the hearing for the professional player has become complicated. His lawyers are defending him while the Australian government has yet to rule on his visa cancellation.
advertisement
Separately, Monday’s process was delayed due to the technical issues encountered during a live stream. Further updates are pending.
Is Nick Wood On Wikipedia?
No, Nick aka Nicholas Wood is not available on the Wikipedia page. In addition, he recently gained public attention after the famous professional player appointed him.
Amst all the chaos surrounding Novak’s visa, Wood has been arguing as his attorney for the player’s stay. Nick’s personal information is currently unavailable.
However, it has been revealed that he is Svensson Barristers. Without details about him, his LinkedIn account was difficult to spot.
What Is Nick Wood Net Worth?
Nick is a seasoned attorney with experience in public and commercial law. During his professional career he has appeared in various court cases.
With years of accomplishment, Wood must have had fair earnings. Despite this, the details about his salary remain unknown.
Likewise, his assets are currently available. However, as a professional lawyer, he has to live a pretty decent life.
PART 2 – MLG35/2022 Novak Djokovic v Minister for Home Affairs
Images related to the topicPART 2 – MLG35/2022 Novak Djokovic v Minister for Home Affairs
See some more details on the topic Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict here:
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – 44Bars.com
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood- Court Hearing Update … The court hearing has started to pick concerns over the treatment of nine times Australian Opens champions.
Source: 44bars.com
Date Published: 8/20/2021
View: 8681
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing …
Djokovic lawyer Nick Wood, an SC barrister, argued to re-conser Visa Cancellation after an unfortunate typo error.
Source: showbizcorner.com
Date Published: 5/11/2022
View: 6239
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – 650.org
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict. Djokovic lawyer Nick Wood, an SC barrister, argued to re-conser Visa …
Source: www.650.org
Date Published: 3/22/2022
View: 6701
Novak Djokovic deported from Australia after Federal Court loss
‘Anti-vax’ warning. Djokovic’s lawyer Nick Wood, SC, sa the possibility of his client’s visa being cancelled, leading to his deportation, …
Source: www.9news.com.au
Date Published: 5/15/2021
View: 2959
Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict
Djokovic attorney Nick Wood, an SC attorney, argued to reconsider the visa cancellation after an unfortunate typo.
Novak Djokovic news court result Tennis star deported from Australia after Federal Court loss
Novak Djokovic has left Australia after losing a federal court bid to overturn his visa annulment, Immigration Secretary Alex Hawke has confirmed.
The world No. 1 was spotted at Melbourne Airport on Sunday night awaiting deportation on the eve of the Australian Open after the federal court ruled unanimously to reject his application to have his visa suspended.
In a statement, Mr Djokovic said he was “extremely disappointed with the court ruling” but respected it and promised to “co-operate with the relevant authorities”.
You can read the full statement at the bottom of the page.
READ MORE: Tsunami warnings for Australia after underwater volcano erupts near Tonga
Novak Djokovic heads out to follow court cases in Melbourne. (Nine)
Djokovic’s flight, Emirates EK409 to Dubai, departed from Melbourne Airport on Sunday evening and minutes before 11pm Mr Hawke confirmed Djokovic had left the country.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison welcomed the decision and said it was ‘time to move on with the Australian Open’.
“Strong borders are fundamental to the Australian way of life, as is the rule of law,” he said.
“Our government has always understood this and has stood ready to take the necessary decisions and actions to protect the integrity of our borders.”
Djokovic’s lawyers had unsuccessfully argued that Immigration Secretary Alex Hawke’s decision to cancel the visa on Friday was “illogical, irrational and unreasonable”.
Mr Djokovic’s legal team requested the same order that Federal Court Judge Anthony Kelly issued earlier in the week to overturn the cancellation and release Djokovic from custody within half an hour.
Instead, the court dismissed the motion to review the termination against later agreed costs.
Before handing over the entire bank of the court’s orders, Chief Justice James Allsop stressed that the court was only judging the “lawfulness or legality” of the decision.
“It is not part of the function of the court to decide on the merits or wisdom of the decision,” he said shortly before 6 p.m. on Sunday.
The deportation drew sharp criticism from Serbia, where President Aleskandar Vucic said the Australian government had “humiliated itself” and Prime Ministers and Ana Brnabic called the court’s decision “scandalous”.
The court’s written reasoning is to be published at a later date.
Djokovic promises to work with the authorities to leave the country
Novak Djokovic is ‘extremely disappointed’ at the federal court’s rejection of his appeal against the visa annulment, but has promised to work with Australian authorities to exit the country.
The tennis superstar said he will take some time to rest after the high-profile court battle that kept the tennis world in suspense ahead of the Australian Open.
In a statement issued shortly after the German Supreme Court’s unanimous decision rejecting his attempt to stay in the country, the Serb said he was “unwell” the saga had put him in the spotlight and hoped the spotlight would shift to the “game” and tournament I love”.
“I am extremely disappointed with the court ruling to dismiss my request for judicial review of the Minister’s decision to cancel my visa, which means I cannot remain in Australia and attend the Australian Open,” he said.
“I respect the court’s ruling and will cooperate with the relevant authorities regarding my departure from the country.”
Novak Djokovic leaves the Park Hotel in Melbourne on Sunday. (Luis Enrique Ascui)
DJOKOVIC SUBMISSIONS
Djokovic left the Park Hotel in Melbourne around 8.30am today where he was in immigration detention after the federal government canceled his visa for a second time.
The Australian Federal Court hearing began at 9.30am AEDT and was conducted online with Chief Justice Allsop, Justice Anthony Besanko and Justice David O’Callaghan conducting the hearing at three different locations.
Scroll down for key points from the court hearing
“Unreasonableness and Irrationality”
The reasons put forward by Mr Djokovic’s lawyers were as follows:
First reason: the government has not considered the consequences of the cancellation of his visa.
Second reason: the minister fails to satisfy himself that Mr Djokovic’s presence “is or could be” a relevant risk.
Reason three: “Inappropriateness and irrationality” regarding Mr Djokovic’s vaccination stance
“Anti-Vax” warning
Djokovic’s lawyer, Nick Wood, SC, said the possibility of his client’s visa being annulled, which could result in his deportation, could in itself generate “anti-vax sentiments” – a factor he says the immigration secretary is not taking into account have.
Mr Hawke had argued that allowing Djokovic to remain in Australia could spark anti-vaccination sentiment across Australia.
Novak Djokovic has made a final appeal to stay in the country. (Getty)
“We contend that the Minister failed to consider the obvious alternative scenario,” Mr Wood said.
“The possibility of (Mr Djokovic’s) visa being annulled, (he) being expelled from the country and his career generally being affected…it’s quite obvious that in itself that can create anti-vax sentiment.”
Minister’s move “based on selected quotes”
Mr Wood has argued that the Immigration Secretary’s claim that Mr Djokovic is not being vaccinated is based on selected quotes from a BBC article.
He also referred to articles published by the Guardian and ABC News about anti-vaccination groups and protests.
Mr Wood said “Mr Djokovic (was) not even mentioned in these articles” so it was “simply wrong” to speculate that his presence could lead to reduced uptake of vaccinations or reinforce anti-vaccination minority views.
“The content of the articles concerns all events prior to this year and prior to his arrival in Australia.”
Mr Wood said the only evidence presented by the Immigration Secretary of Djokovic’s vaccination views was the BBC article ‘What did Novak Djokovic actually say about vaccines?’.
He said the comments in the story were made before COVID-19 vaccines were available.
Mr Wood said the anti-vaccination protests that have taken place this week were “targeted at action by the State” to cancel his client’s visa.
He added that since COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out around the world, Mr Djokovic has attended numerous tennis tournaments and no anti-vaccination rallies have taken place at those events.
He argued that the government canceling Mr Djokovic’s visa was the “single trigger for the galvanization of anti-vax sentiment”.
Mr Wood has argued the Immigration Secretary only considered the possible anti-vaccination reaction if Mr Djokovic was allowed to remain in Australia, which was “unreasonable and irrational”.
“It’s irrational and unreasonable to only look at one side of the coin,” he said.
“It’s a bit perverse to use a point lens with such a narrow focal length.”
He repeated the BBC article as Mr Hawke’s evidence is not strong enough to justify his client’s deportation.
Views of tennis star ‘not wanted’
Mr Wood said Mr Hawke had not caught up with Mr Djokovic’s current views on vaccination and instead relied on selected quotes from the BBC article published in April 2020 in which he argued against vaccination.
The Immigration Minister did not include Mr Djokovic’s clarification in his evidence, where he later stated he was not an expert but remained open and would choose what was best for his body.
Novak Djokovic during a training session ahead of the 2022 Australian Open at Melbourne Park. (AP)
“It also necessarily implies that the Minister accepts that he therefore does not know what Mr Djokovic’s views are at the moment,” Mr Wood said.
On the back of Mr Djokovic’s lawyer, Mr Wood, who claimed the government had failed to get his client’s current views on vaccination, Mr Hawke’s representative, Stephen Lloyd SC, said the tennis star could have used that hearing to break the record to correct.
“Mr Djokovic has chosen not to appear as evidence in this proceeding,” Mr Lloyd said.
“He could just do it and he could fix the record if it needed fixing.
“But he hasn’t, and that has important consequences.”
GOVERNMENT NOTICES
“He was against vaccinations”
Federal government attorney Stephen Lloyd SC said the therapeutic exemption Djokovic received, which allegedly exempted him from the vaccination, relates to contracting COVID-19 in mid-December.
However, Mr Lloyd pointed out that he could have been vaccinated last year but decided against it.
“The minister was allowed to assume that it was his decision,” he said.
“Even before vaccines were available, he was against – his prima facie position was to be against.”
Mr Lloyd said Mr Hawke’s rationale for canceling the tennis star’s visa was a concern that his anti-vaccination views could hamper vaccination in Australia and that his presence in the country could spark “a degree of unrest”.
Immigration Secretary Alex Hawke. (Alex Ellinghausen)
“The Minister was concerned that Mr Djokovic’s presence would encourage people to emulate his position and this would endanger the health of Australians,” Mr Lloyd said.
He said Mr Hawke’s concerns were not limited to anti-vaccination groups but to the broader Australian community.
“He’s a high-profile individual and in many ways a role model for a lot of people,” Mr Lloyd said.
Mr Lloyd said there was also the issue of Mr Djokovic violating COVID-19 restrictions abroad, citing the news that the tennis star conducted a media interview and photoshoot while knowingly contracting the virus.
The lawyer said Mr Hawke feared the Australian community would “mimic his disregard for these safety measures”.
As such, his presence in Australia posed an “overwhelming risk” to the community.
Consequence of visa cancellation ‘was being considered’
Mr Lloyd said the Immigration Secretary had considered the consequences of both canceling Djokovic’s visa and being allowed to remain in the country.
“He has done his best to look into the matter and is aware of the fact that (Djokovic’s) views have not been sought. This suggests that the minister tried to look at things broadly,” he said.
“The Minister is aware that his decision has consequences … both ways.”
After lunch, Mr Lloyd, who is deputizing for the Immigration Secretary, said his client acknowledged that “there has already been some community unrest” due to Djokovic’s presence in Australia.
“He is aware of the unrest and taking it into account,” he said.
Mr Lloyd told the court his client was aware there were groups in Australia who “idolised” Djokovic for his stance on vaccination.
‘Anti-Vax View’
Mr Lloyd said Djokovic was “assumed to support an anti-vaccination view” which posed a risk to Australian society, particularly among those who were unsure about vaccination and those who idolized the tennis star what could lead to “health care consequences”.
“His status can influence people who look up to him,” he said.
Mr Wood said if the judges are in favor of Djokovic he is asking that the decision to annul his client’s visa be overturned and that he be released from immigration detention within 30 minutes.
This is the same order Judge Kelly issued earlier in the week when his visa was first annulled.
Mr Wood supports an order given today for reasons that will follow later due to time constraints.
background to the case
In a document filed with the court on Saturday, Djokovic’s lawyer claims Immigration Secretary Alex Hawke’s decision to cancel the visa on Friday was “illogical, irrational and unreasonable”.
Meanwhile, part of Mr Hawke’s argument will be that Djokovic’s presence in Australia “could encourage anti-vaccination sentiment” and undermine the country’s vaccination policy.
The minister said this could lead in particular to:
“An increase in anti-vaccination sentiment generated in the Australian community, resulting in others refusing to be vaccinated or refusing to receive a booster vaccine.”
“A strengthening of the views of a minority in the Australian community who remain unvaccinated against COVID-19.”
“People who choose not to receive a booster vaccine.”
“Unvaccinated individuals become very unwell and/or transmit it to others.”
“Increased pressure on Australia’s healthcare system.”
In his justification, Mr Hawke also said he took into account that Djokovic has shown “an apparent disregard for the need to isolate after receiving a positive COVID-19 test result”.
The minister has referred to the fact that Djokovic attended an interview and photoshoot with French magazine L’Equipe on December 18 despite being knowingly positive for COVID-19.
Novak Djokovic’s full statement
“I would like to make a brief statement regarding the results of today’s court hearing. I will now take some time to rest and recover before commenting beyond that.
I am very disappointed with the Court’s ruling to deny my application for judicial review of the Minister’s decision to cancel my visa, meaning I cannot stay in Australia and attend the Australian Open.
I respect the Court’s judgment and will cooperate with the relevant authorities in connection with my departure from the country.
I’m uncomfortable that the focus has been on me for the past few weeks and I hope that now we can all focus on the game and tournament I love. I would like to wish the players, tournament officials, staff, volunteers and fans all the best for the tournament.
Finally, I would like to thank my family, friends, team, supporters, fans and fellow Serbians for their continued support. They were all a great source of strength to me.”
Fans wait outside the court for updates on Djokovik. (Marta Pascual Juanola)
Full statement by Prime Minister Scott Morrison
The Full Federal Court of Australia has ruled unanimously to dismiss Mr Novak Djokovic’s application for judicial review which sought to challenge the Secretary of State for Immigration’s decision to cancel his visa.
This cancellation decision was made for reasons of health, safety and good order as it was in the public interest.
I applaud the decision to keep our borders strong and protect Australians.
As I said on Friday, Australians have made many sacrifices during this pandemic and they rightly expect the outcome of those sacrifices to be protected.
During the pandemic, we have collectively achieved one of the lowest mortality rates, the strongest economies, and the highest immunization rates in the world.
Strong borders are as fundamental to the Australian way of life as the rule of law.
Our government has always understood this and has been ready to take the necessary decisions and actions to protect the integrity of our borders.
I thank the court for its prompt attention to these issues and the patience of everyone involved while we worked to resolve this issue.
Novak Djokovic hires four more lawyers after glaring error on injunction form
We use your registration to deliver content in a way you have consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include advertising from us and third parties, as we understand it. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Sign up for FREE to get the latest news and player updates
Novak Djokovic added four more lawyers to his army of representatives ahead of his fight against the Australian government in court. The case of the world No. 1 is due to be brought before a judge at 11pm tonight (10am Melbourne) where his fate will be decided.
Djokovic faces renewed imprisonment even if he wins the visa appeal
Djokovic traveled to Australia under the impression he had a medical exemption to enter the country without a Covid vaccination.
However, the 20-time Grand Slam winner suffered a major shock when he was arrested by border officials for not having the right visa.
The 34-year-old is being held in a detention center that his mother has described as “inhumane” and “bug-infested”.
Djokovic is keen to get out and compete at the Australian Open, which starts on January 17th.
It could be that Djokovic was “thrown out on the next plane”, as Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison warned.
Related searches to Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict
Information related to the topic Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict
Here are the search results of the thread Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict from Bing. You can read more if you want.
You have just come across an article on the topic Djokovic Lawyer Nick Wood SC Barrister – Court Hearing Update and Verdict. If you found this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much.
Articles compiled by Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com. See more articles in category: DIGITAL MARKETING