You are viewing this post: Sparkle’S Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where Is She Now In 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape? The 75 Detailed Answer
Are you looking for an answer to the topic “Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape“? We answer all your questions at the website Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com in category: Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com/digital-marketing. You will find the answer right below.
Keep Reading
Sparkle’s niece Reshonda Landfair Age: Where is she now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape. Reshonda Landfair Birthday How Old Great Husband Married Bio Also Read: –
Reshonda Landfair Net Worth and <b>Salary</b>
As of 2019, her occupation and job details are still unknown. Therefore, there is no way to view their asset details. In fact, it is checked.
2016
net worth
unknown
2017
net worth
unknown
2018
net worth
unknown
2019
net worth
Under review
2020
net worth
Under review
The same goes for her salary and earnings details, so far unknown.
2016
salary
unknown
2017
salary
unknown
2018
salary
unknown
2019
salary
unknown
2020
salary
Under review
Parents, Family Info:
Well, she’s kept a low profile for almost 2 decades now. Therefore, she has yet to speak about her family and parents.
Father
unknown
mother
unknown
Brothers
N / A
sister
N / A
ks, ks
N / A
Likewise, she dn’t mention having siblings. The same applies to their marriage. Maybe she’s already walked down the aisle, only she knows.
Reshonda’s Age, Wiki, and Bio- where is she now in 2019?
As of 2019, Reshonda Landfair should be m-30s. In 2000, she was sa to have been about 14 years old. She will be 33 years old in 2019.
Age
The 30s
birthday
unknown
Ethnicity/Nationality
American
She is of African American ethnicity and was born and raised in the United States.
Look into her <b>Height, Weight, and Body Measurements</b>
Reshonda Landfair should be a pretty decent size in 2019. This is based on her looks in 2000 when she was around 14 years old.
Height
M – Approximately 1.65cm – 165ft – 5ft 5in
weight
kg – n.a. pounds – n.a
body measurements
In -N/A Cm -N/A
There are literally no online sources that have been able to keep up with her life. As such, there is no factual information on her physique and personality. Despite living underground, the beautiful woman has undoubtedly managed to fulfill her physical potential.
advertisement
<b>Reshonda Landfair’s Boyfriend, Husband, and Married Life</b>
Reshonda was just 14 years old when the horrific incent happened. She refused to testify against Kelly and move on with her life. However, she has been out of the spotlight for many years. Therefore, there are very few details to look into her personal life. That even includes her love life and relationship. On the contrary, she has no social media presence and has not appeared on camera. So we’re assuming she’s single.
Relationship History
Dating
N / A
Committed
N / A
Married
N / A
divorce
N / A
Unfortunately, details of her past relationship and dating history are also a mystery to be addressed for now.
Who is Reshonda Landfair? Sparkle’s niece in Pee tape
Reshonda Landfair was the victim of a disgusting sex tape in the 1990s. In fact, she was a victim of child pornography. In fact, she was just 14 years old when the incent happened. R&B singer R. Kelly’s sex tape threw her into the spotlight. https://twitter.com/HOUSneakerKing/status/1082078793223888897?s=20 On the other hand, she is a family of an American R&B singer Sparkle. The niece of the famous singer became a victim at the time. Sparkle, originally Stephaine Edwards was the one in the stands who entified the young girl as her niece. Apparently, the videotape included clips of Kelly having sex with then-young 14-year-old Reshonda Landfair. The gross part, however, was when he peed all over her. In fact, the horrifying video went viral for years. Kelly was found not guilty after Reshonda refused to testify against him. Multiple sources claim she was bought and pa for.
<b>5 You Must Know Facts on Reshonda Landfair </b>
Reshonda Landfair’s relationship status is yet to be revealed. Landfair should be in his m-30s. In fact, in 2000, she was just 14 years old. Landfair is a decent size despite the factual data. Reshonda Landfair net worth for 2019 is currently under review. Reshonda has no social media presence whatsoever.
About Boyfriend – Relationships Summary
Reshonda Landfair is the name that made headlines in the early 2000s. However, the news has faded over time. As a result, not much information about her personal life is currently available. This includes her love life and her relationship. She has reportedly been single since 2019.
About Reshonda Landfair
Full name
Reshonda Landfair
Age
In her 30s
birthday
N / A
net worth
N / A
salary
N / A
Spouse (husband/wife/partner)
N / A
ks, ks
N / A
parents/family
N / A
Height / How tall
N / A
nationality
American
ethnicity
African American
occupation/work
N / A
measurements
N / A
gay/lesbian
N / A
Married/Engaged/Divorced
N / A
The Tape
Images related to the topicThe Tape
See some more details on the topic Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape here:
SPARKLE’S NICHTJE RESHONDA LANDFAIR AGE: WHERE IS …
Sparkle’s nichtje Reshonda Landfair Age: Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape. Reshonda Landfair Verjaardag, Hoe oud lang Echtgenoot Getrouwd Bio Lees …
Source: nl.myhairact.com
Date Published: 11/25/2021
View: 9089
Where is Reshona Edwards-Landfair from the R.Kelly Sex tape?
i hope you’re not asking after the child he pissed on like she was a … Sparkle herself wasn’t victimized by Kelly, but her niece was the …
Source: www.lipstickalley.com
Date Published: 5/13/2021
View: 7048
R. Kelly Facing New Charges Is ‘Too Little, Too Late,’ Jim …
Jim DeRogatis recounts his 19-year investigation into the singer in a new book, Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. “It all happened as …
Source: www.npr.org
Date Published: 4/14/2021
View: 9027
Surviving R. Kelly Part 2: The Biggest Revelations – Vulture
Kelly of sexual abuse. “It should have ended with Tiffany Hawkins, victim number one, patient zero, the first girl who sued Kelly for sexual …
Source: www.vulture.com
Date Published: 6/16/2021
View: 8368
Acteur, Actrice, Model, Web-Sterren, Media Persoonlijkheden En Andere, July 2022
Here zeven eenvoudige prenatal of forced schapsoefeningen which u can help om in front of te come and uw baby te positioneren voor een betere geboorte.
R. Kelly Facing New Charges Is ‘Too Little, Too Late,’ Jim DeRogatis Says NPR
TERRY GROSS, HOST:
This is FRESH AIR. I’m Terry Gross. Last week, R&B star R. Kelly was charged with 11 new counts of sexual assault and sexual abuse. In 2000, my guest, Jim DeRogatis, broke the story of how Kelly used his fame to get early teenage girls to have sex with him. DeRogatis began his investigation after receiving an anonymous fax alleging that Kelly was having sex with underage girls. At the time, DeRogatis was the pop music critic for the Chicago Sun-Times. He teamed up with the newspaper’s legal reporter, Abdon Pallasch, and they followed up on the leads in the fax. Her first article on R. Kelly was published in the Chicago Sun-Times in December 2000. In early 2002, DeRogatis received a very disturbing sex tape of Kelly and a 14-year-old girl. This now infamous video that Kelly made resulted in him being charged with 21 counts of child pornography and going to court on 14 counts. A jury found him not guilty, allowing Kelly to pursue a successful music career and continue chasing girls.
Meanwhile, DeRogatis continued his investigations and spoke to other women who had been his victims, as well as families of girls whom Kelly had sexually assaulted. In 2017, DeRogatis published a story about how R. Kelly led a sex cult that prevented girls from leaving or communicating with their families. Now DeRogatis has written a new book titled Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. DeRogatis is the co-host of the public radio show and podcast, Sound Opinions, and teaches at Columbia College Chicago.
Jim DeRogatis, welcome to FRESH AIR and congratulations on your years of reporting this story. So…
JIM DEROGATIS: Thank you.
GROSS: … Let’s start with the new criminal charges against R. Kelly. What are you?
DEROGATIS: Kelly has been charged with 10 counts of sexual assault stemming from three new victims and a videotape dating from the time of the original tape that indicted him in 2002. And then they added several more charges, 11 more charges, to one of the victims. She first broke her nondisclosure agreement with Kelly when she spoke to me for BuzzFeed News in August 2017. She was 15 and skipping high school classes to attend Kelly’s trial, and he began having sexual contact with her shortly after he was acquitted.
GROSS: And this is the woman identified in the indictment as J.P. identified, but you know her as Jerhonda Pace.
DEROGATIS: Yes, she was Jerhonda Johnson when she was a teenager. She is now Jerhonda Pace – a very brave young woman, mother of three.
GROSS: So those are charges against him for aggravated assault. So he didn’t just have sex with the young women. He attacked some of them. What nature were some of the attacks?
DEROGATIS: It compelled these young women to give him pleasure. You know, the problem with the Illinois indictments is that they’ve barely scratched the surface of 30 years of Kelly’s crimes, you know, that’s – that was never a book that I wanted to write. This was a dark and terrible place to live. But I think despite all the discussion after “Surviving R. Kelly,” you interviewed Dream Hampton, you know, we don’t realize that this behavior of stalking young girls and sexually abusing them started in 1991 and is driving now away while you and I speak.
You know, there are two young women, 19 and 22, with him at Trump Tower Chicago, where he lives. And, you know, they’re physically and emotionally abused when they break his rules, according to other women who witnessed it and broke up with him. It’s scary. You know, that happened in front of the world for 30 years while he was selling 100 million albums and, you know, opening the Winter Olympics. And it all happened while everyone was watching and nobody was doing anything.
GROSS: So it wasn’t just a sexual assault. He physically beat some of the women…
DEROGATIS: Yes.
BIG: …who he was dating, some of the girls he was dating.
DEROGATIS: Yes. I spoke to Dominique Gardner and the world wanted to know what happened to her after breaking up with Kelly. She was with him for nine years, starting as a 17-year-old shortly after his acquittal in 2008. And she broke her silence and spoke to me for the first time at the New Yorker. There’s 48 women whose names I know that he abused, you know, and she said, you know, I loved him and he loved me. And when it was good, Jim, it was perfect. But, yes, he hit me with an extension cord and, yes, he choked me and, yes, he starved me and, yes, he tried to break me.
And I think, you know, we still don’t really understand this strange power and charisma of this man, this super predator. You know, there’s the music. There’s the glory. There’s all the appeal of being next to R. Kelly. Many of these women – almost all of them wanted to be singers. He wanted to make her a star like he did with Aaliyah, whom he married when she was 15. But beyond that, Dominique Gardner looked at me and the fourth or fifth time – it took her nine months to communicate with her. She always texted me, emailed me, called me. I never twisted her arm, and she finally said I’m ready to speak officially. I’m only doing it with you, Jim.
GROSS: Let’s talk about how you started investigating the R. Kelly story. You received a one-page fax in November 2000. What was in that fax?
DEROGATIS: Terry, you know, on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving 2000, I got a fax saying I’m sending this to you, Mr. DeRogatis, because I don’t know where else to go. I had written a record review for Kelly’s fifth album TP-2.com. And you know, that’s almost a cliche – I’m sorry to admit it. I said, you know, the juxtaposition of Kelly’s hot and horny bedroom jams and his tearful pleas for forgiveness from the Lord was so upsetting it could give you whiplash. It’s an R&B term, of course – you know, Reverend Al Green and Prince and Marvin Gaye, sex and redemption. It’s a fine line.
And the anonymous author – I don’t know to this day who that was and I’ve tried very hard to find out – said, I quote: “I think Marvin Gaye had problems too, but I don’t think they were like that Robert I have known Robert for many years and have tried to get him to get help but he just won’t. I am telling you about this in the hope that you or someone in your newspaper will write an article and then Robert will have no choice but to get help. Marvin Gaye had his problems, but Robert’s problem – and it goes back many years – is young girls.”
So that was a rumour. Terry, I feel guilty that when I began reporting this story with my colleague at the Sun-Times, Abdon Pallasch, in November 2000, we were already more than nine years late. You know, the first sexual contact with teenagers documented in the Tiffany Hawkins lawsuit begins in 1991, and he marries Aaliyah in 1994 when she is 15 – illegally. You know, that was – everyone from the tape operators in the recording studios and junior promo people in the Midwest, at the labels, to the President of Jive Records, Clive Calder, they all knew about it. Lawsuits were filed and they were named as a party, the record companies, the managers. Yes. And I threw the fax in the garbage heap, Terry, but I went home and had Thanksgiving long weekend. And something about that bothered me. I just read you this section. I hope Robert needs to get help. I didn’t think a random hater would show that kind of compassion. And there were many details, names and dates and facts.
BIG: Yes. There were clues in the facts.
DEROGATIS: Yes, there was content.
GROSS: What were some of the clues in the facts?
DEROGATIS: The main one is — you know, there was a lawsuit from a young girl named Tiffany Hawkins. You had the wrong date. They said 1997. It was 1996. I think if we hadn’t found this lawsuit that was filed on Christmas Eve 1996, Abdon and I would never have started six weeks of 18-hour days of reporting. But what really got me is that you could call Sergeant Chuziki (ph) from the Chicago Police Department – she was the one in charge of investigating Robert. So I’m cursing myself all long Thanksgiving weekend for not bringing this fax home so I can read it again. I’m going back to the office and I’ve had a good look at this fax. And I called CPD headquarters and asked for Sergeant Chuziki and I spelled it out from the fax. And they said, oh, we don’t have anyone by that name. And I almost hung up. And then I said, do you have someone with a similar Polish surname in sex crimes in – yes. And suddenly there’s a pause and I’m put through and a woman picks up the phone – Chizahuski (ph) special investigation.
And I said I’m Jim DeRogatis. I’m calling from the Sun-Times about the R. Kelly investigation. And she says – and this is kind of like one of those moments in my life that I’ll never forget – oh, I was wondering how long it would be before someone called me about it. I can’t speak to you – and I hung up. That was code for there being one hell of a story in here, and I ran to Metro editor Don Hayner, and it all starts with that.
GROSS: So your colleague Abdon Pallasch, who was responsible for legal issues at the Sun-Times, joined forces with you. And he knows how to research things in the legal system, and he found the file for this lawsuit. There were over 200 pages of documents in the file.
DEROGATIS: Two hundred and thirty-five pages (laughter).
BIG: Yes.
DEROGATIS: Yes.
GROSS: And he copied them, and you had that as a background. Where did that take you?
DEROGATIS: Many witnesses were called in the lawsuit. You know, Abdon started poking around the courtroom and talking to investigators. I started talking to everyone who was on the witness list. And we both—as white as white people get—start ringing the doorbells all over town south and west. And what was extraordinary for us, you know, we kept getting invited to people’s homes. And people were constantly — they weren’t surprised that we were asking about R. Kelly and underage girls. They invited us in and said nobody would ever listen to us. Thank you for caring And this is November.
GROSS: So you said you were knocking on doors. Whose doors did you knock on? You weren’t knocking on doors indiscriminately. What clues did you have…
DEROGATIS: No, no.
GROSS: …point you in the right direction?
DEROGATIS: There were a few dozen names on the witness list in the Hawkins case. And, you know, there was apparently a testimony, as we later learned – 7 1/2 hours being grilled by Kelly’s attorneys. Well, that was public knowledge. But to date, it has disappeared from court records. The Cook County Courthouse is notorious for being just a cesspool where things get lost and things get misfiled. And we were lucky to find 235 pages of the Hawkins case. The deposit is missing. There were no other statements, so we started doing what a lawyer would have done and asking these people what they would say. And they told us.
GROSS: So let’s pause here. While you’re at it, my guest is music critic Jim DeRogatis. His new book is called Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. And he’s covered R. Kelly for two decades, and he uncovered the story of that original videotape and has been following that story ever since. We’ll be right back. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF “LOLA” OF THE WEE TRIO)
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR, and while you’re at it, my guest is music critic Jim DeRogatis. He has a new book called Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. He has covered R. Kelly for two decades and published the R. Kelly story — the story of how he sexually and physically abused underage girls.
So they met the aunt of the girl who was described in the fax as the girl Kelly called his goddaughter, but he actually had sex with her. So the aunt’s name was Stephanie Edwards. But professionally, and then personally, she’s known as Sparkle. And she actually introduced R. Kelly to her niece when her niece was 12. Her niece’s name is Reshona.
DEROGATIS: Reshona Landfair, yes, and she was wracked with guilt, as was Kelly’s manager, Barry Hankerson, for introducing Kelly to his niece, Aaliyah.
GROSS: And they both thought, oh, R. Kelly is going to help our nieces with their careers. And…
DEROGATIS: Yes.
BIG: You became his sexual…
DEROGATIS: He sexually abused her when she was a minor. Yes. I mean there are no two ways. And by that point, they were already at the end of a long number. According to the lawsuits filed by Tiffany Hawkins and the other women, there were more than a dozen, you know?
GROSS: So you find out about this girl who just — who Kelly described as his goddaughter. The police told you they had questioned you twice and they have denied any kind of sexual encounter with him. Her parents would not speak to the police. How did that help how you weighed what your aunt told you?
DEROGATIS: You know, we didn’t mention anything about the relationship stuff. It’s not a relationship. It’s illegal sexual contact. We did not mention the illegal sexual contact in our first story dated December 21, 2000 because the Landfair family did not want to speak to us. And Sparkle had been elliptical. I introduced Kelly to my niece. I broke up with Kelly. She’s still hanging around. I don’t think it’s a good idea, but I’m not her mother or whatever. She’s talking about her sister.
We knew this was happening. We had pictures from her eighth grade yearbook and her high school freshmen. And two weeks after story #1 – December 21, 2000 is the first story – two weeks later I got a videotape of Fed-Exed from the Sun-Times. It was Kelly having sex with a young woman. We had this – this collection at the time – so sad to say – in a Manila binder of yearbook pictures and eighth grade school photos. It wasn’t one of those girls.
We spent two weeks trying to figure out who made this girl with a discreet headshot. To date, she has never been identified. What you need to understand is that Chicago has been lousy on the streets, as they say, with videotapes of Kelly having sex with young women, some of whom are underage. So the tape that accused him didn’t come to me until February 2002.
GROSS: So I want to come back to the process of reporting this story because it’s a very interesting process and also a very challenging one – personally, legally, journalistically. So the first sentence of your very first story about R. Kelly is (reads): Chicago singer-songwriter R. Kelly used his famous and influential position as a pop superstar to meet and have sex with girls as young as 15 court records and interviews.
So you were expecting a really big reaction. What was the reaction you got?
DEROGATIS: Deafening silence and condemnation – condemned by Black Radio, condemned – Talk Radio and the music stations, condemned by the Black community, condemned by Reverend Jesse Jackson – there are bigger problems in the world than R. Kelly – condemned by the Baptist power structure. Yes, we got a lot of hate mail. There is one extraordinary columnist and she still tends to what is left of the Chicago Sun-Times, Mary Mitchell. I was a little scared of Mary. Mary was a wild, wild advocate for black women. And Mary didn’t play with the pop music critic.
And I walked the halls of the Sun-Times – this is a woman who at the age of 41, after raising three children in the projects, goes back to college, becomes a journalist – Columbia College Chicago, where I now teach – becomes a journalist for the Sun-Times, becomes a member of the editorial board and a columnist. Mary stops and hugs me and says that was a good story. you did well And she wrote 28 columns in the first two years of R. Kelly coverage because she wanted the black community to stand up and pay attention to their daughters. You know yeah he’s a black superstar, a hero. Do the girls matter?
GROSS: How long did it take you to get the second video?
DEROGATIS: The second video was 14 months after story #1. It was released on the first Friday of February 2002.
GROSS: And describe what you saw in this video.
DEROGATIS: That’s the worst thing I’ve ever had to experience in my life.
GROSS: So I want to tell our listeners that this is a very disturbing video. You may have heard the details of it before. Maybe not. But it’s a very disturbing video so this is a warning to listeners and especially to parents of young children who may be listening now.
DEROGATIS: So I had heard about this thing, and as soon as – I was working in my home office to transcribe an interview with Alicia Keys and the phone rang and I did that, I’m too busy for that in this journalism thing. DeRogatis, go to your mailbox.
GROSS: That’s what the caller said, go to your mailbox.
DEROGATIS: Go to your mailbox, hang up. So I went to the mailbox and there was a brown envelope with a videotape – both unmarked. Popped it – “Toy Story 2” from my daughter’s VCR. She was at school. I am looking. I knew immediately what it was going to be. And it’s 26 minutes and 39 seconds, that’s the length of a sitcom, you know what’s forever when you see something as disturbing as Kelly having sex with a 14-year-old and telling her what to do, how to perform shall for him, dance for him, urinate for him, open your mouth, he urinates, he enjoys with her. He calls her by her name. Yes. I mean it was horrific. And it goes on and on and on and on. And he adjusts the cameras. He’s checking the – I mean, he’s running this scene. And this girl has the disembodied appearance of a rape victim. It’s horrible, Terry. It is rape and you are witnessing a rape.
GROSS: So this is further evidence of your investigation. It’s also criminal evidence. And you and your writing partner Abdon Pallasch and your editors have decided to turn the tape over to the police while you continue to investigate this story. How did you decide to do this? Because many people would say you are a journalist, your job is to cover the story, not interfere with the investigation, and testify to the police.
DEROGATIS: You know, we took it as evidence of a crime, and child pornography is such a toxic crime that if we saw it, touched it, or copied it, we committed a crime. But more importantly, if this girl keeps getting hurt, we can’t sit idly by here. When we had this conference, we were dealing with the first videotape because we didn’t know if it was a minor. We had this conversation in January 2001. So we had crossed that Rubicon and to this day we are being condemned by some journalism professors for giving the first tape to the police. The second volume – we didn’t waste a lot of time talking about it. You know, it was a lot clearer that this had to be in the hands of the police. We didn’t tell them we knew who the girl was. We didn’t tell them where it came from because to this day I don’t know where it came from, who was the source that supplied it. We didn’t tell them anything. We just said that this is evidence of a crime. you must have it
BIG: My guest is reporter and music critic Jim DeRogatis, author of the new book Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. After a pause, we talk about how Kelly silenced his victims and why many of them spoke to DeRogatis. And Maureen Corrigan will review a new autobiographical novel by Ocean Vuong about a young Vietnamese immigrant. I’m Terry Gross and this is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE MUSIC)
BIG: This is FRESH AIR. I’m Terry Gross. Coming back to my interview with reporter and pop music critic Jim DeRogatis, author of the new book Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly. In 2000, DeRogatis broke the story that the R&B star was having sexual relations with underage girls. A few years later, DeRogatis published the story of the now infamous, disturbing video of Kelly having sex with a 14-year-old girl. DeRogatis has been investigating Kelly for two decades. Last week, Kelly was charged with 11 new counts of sexual assault and abuse. In 2008, Kelly was tried on 14 counts of child pornography related to the tape DeRogatis covered in 2002.
So there were 14 counts against R. Kelly and he was found not guilty on all 14 counts. What do you attribute that to, since, I mean, there was a videotape? Now the young girl did not report in the video. Her parents didn’t get in touch. Your Aunt Sparkle testified.
DEROGATIS: In detail. Yes. There were 15 state witnesses who testified that the girl was the girl and Kelly Kelly and they knew of this relationship starting with Reshona Landfair’s aunt Sparkle and her uncle. And, you know, the uncle’s wife, who happened to be a Chicago cop. your basketball coach. Some of her best friends. Best friends parents.
The jury heard all of this evidence. But Reshona Landfair, her mother and father never testified. And there’s another videotape of Reshona with Kelly that’s part of the current Illinois indictment. She is still – according to my sources, my understanding, the prosecution – not cooperating with the state of Illinois. It’s the same story as in 2008. The trial between the indictment and the trial lasted six years. All records in Cook County broken.
And throughout that time, Judge Vincent Gaughan methodically ruled in favor of the defense on countless motions. He would not allow evidence for the three civil lawsuits filed against Kelly by underage girls, for the adult woman who was suing Kelly for videotaping her having sex with him without her knowledge, for the Aaliyah thing, for any payments made to which were made family of the girl on the videotape, of each pattern, to buy the silence of women with non-disclosure agreements for payment. The judge did the many crimes Kelly had committed since 1991 — in 2008, when it went to trial, it centered on a girl in a video. And she didn’t testify. Neither did her mother and father.
And although the jury all believed it was Kelly on that tape because they had never heard of a victim, they acquitted. It was also Father’s Day weekend and they didn’t want to be confiscated over the holiday.
GROSS: You mentioned payments to the girl’s parents in the video. Do you have evidence that R. Kelly paid the parents not to talk about the video?
DEROGATIS: I don’t report that in the book and I don’t know exactly. And to this day, you know, no, I can’t prove that. Many sources say the family was paid off. What the book does, Terry, is 30 years of Kelly using this tool that Harvey Weinstein used, the non-disclosure agreement — I’ll give you money in exchange for promising never to tell the truth. It was an effective tool he used for 30 years to silence women he had hurt. I can’t prove he paid witnesses.
But the ongoing federal investigation, the federal grand jury sitting in Illinois’ Northern District, is hearing obstruction of justice, aka evidence, in addition to sex trafficking and transportation of minors across state lines and tax evasion. This is her case.
GROSS: Have most of the young women you spoke to told you that they signed non-disclosure agreements with R. Kelly and that by speaking to you they are breaking those agreements?
DEROGATIS: Every single one. Yes. I mean, there were some of the witnesses in the other girls’ cases who didn’t sue him and didn’t get paid by him. But yes, the vast majority of the girls I’ve interviewed broke non-disclosure agreements and told me they took his money and now trust me to tell their story.
GROSS: So did that mean you had to tell your story anonymously, or were you willing to face the consequences of violating the nondisclosure agreement?
DEROGATIS: No. Yes. I mean, I – when Jerhonda Pace got on the record – Jerhonda Johnson when she was a kid – got on the record in August 2017, she knowingly broke her non-disclosure agreement. Lizzette Martinez spoke to me for the first time for BuzzFeed. And her story is detailed in the book. She had never taken his money. Tiffany Hawkins, the very first girl to try to stop him, began this sexual contact at age 15. It lasted from 1991 to 1993, before Aaliyah. She sued in 1996, only after going to the Illinois District Attorney and wanting to file criminal charges. They weren’t interested in pursuing the case any further. I said why when we finally spoke? She said they wouldn’t believe a young black girl.
It’s been 19 years, Terry. This story begins with her. If it weren’t for the mention of her lawsuit and the facts, I don’t think this coverage would ever have started. And I finally met her in January. And we had rung her bell. We had spoken to her mother on the phone. We hadn’t gotten anywhere. They didn’t want to break the NDA in 2000. In January 2019 she said: I want to tell my story once and there is no one I trust. I would like to talk to you. Let’s meet. And we did that with her lawyer. And he said I have to advise you, you know, you’re breaking a non-disclosure agreement.
And we talked for three hours. And she hugged me. And I said it must have been one of the worst days of your life when we put your name in the newspaper in December 2000 and said you took this man’s money. And she said no, I respect what you did.
GROSS: Tell us a little bit about the story she shared with you about her relationship with R. Kelly and what he did to her.
DEROGATIS: She said, you know, he called me the cable girl. And I said, Tiffany, what are you doing – cable girl? Yes. I connected him. I’m not proud of that, she said. I introduced him to five or six of my 15 year old schoolmates and he had sex with them before he and I ever had sex. And I’ll have to live with that. When she broke up with Kelly after singing with Aaliyah, this girl from Cottage Grove Heights on Chicago’s South Side had a voice like an angel when she was in high school. He picks her up in high school choir class. He returns to visit his alma mater. He attended for a year and never graduated. She and her two best friends sing behind Aaliyah, and she truly becomes Aaliyah’s best friend. And Aaliyah’s parents call her at home when Aaliyah goes missing because she ran away to marry Kelly, assuming they will be with Tiffany. And she wasn’t with Tiffany.
So Tiffany had sung with Aaliyah, seen Paris, Amsterdam, Rome, London – traveled the world. After breaking up with Kelly and losing her best friend Aaliyah for having teenage sex and setting him up — and living with the guilt of knowing she set him up with six of her 15-year-old friends, she attempted suicide . She survived. She only got two-thirds of $250,000 because the attorney kept one-third. And she took that money. Sie hat es verschwendet. Sie war…
GROSS: Dieses Geld war die Auszahlung von…
DEROGATIS: Das Geld war die Auszahlung…
GROSS: …R. Kelly für ihr Schweigen.
DEROGATIS: …Im Austausch für die Geheimhaltungsvereinbarung. Und dann rappelte sie sich auf. Sie hatte einen kleinen Sohn von einem Highschool-Freund, mit dem sie wieder zusammengekommen war. Sie geht mit ihm auf dem Schoß zur Schule. Und sie – wissen Sie, und sie leitet jetzt eine Ultraschallabteilung in einem Krankenhaus. Sie hat nach ihrem Bachelor-Abschluss einen Master-Abschluss in Betriebswirtschaft gemacht. Weißt du, sie hat sich ein Leben aufgebaut. Und sie sagte, manchmal sagen die Leute – wer hätte das gedacht – wissen Sie, das war R. Kellys Geld, dass Sie ein schönes Haus haben, dass Sie ein Auto haben. Und sie – nein, nein, nein. Sie hatte alles verschwendet. Und von Anfang an war es nichts – zwei Drittel von 250.000 Dollar nach Anwaltskosten. Sie hatte es vermasselt, und dann baute sie dieses Leben auf. Und sie überlebte nicht nur, sie blühte auf. Und es dauerte 19 Jahre, bis sie sich entschied, ihre Geschichte zu erzählen.
GROSS: Hat eine der Frauen, mit denen Sie gesprochen haben, mit Konsequenzen gerechnet, weil sie ihre Geheimhaltungsvereinbarungen mit R. Kelly gebrochen hat?
DEROGATIS: Nein. Kelly hat eine der Frauen, die mit mir gesprochen haben, gedroht, aber nie wirklich Vergeltung geübt. Und ich möchte hinzufügen, dass ich in den 19 Jahren der Berichterstattung über Kelly nie einen Widerruf oder eine Klarstellung erteilen musste oder verklagt wurde.
GROSS: Also lass uns hier eine kurze Pause machen und dann reden wir weiter. Wenn Sie sich uns gerade anschließen, mein Gast ist Jim DeRogatis, der die R. Kelly-Geschichte veröffentlichte und sie zwei Jahrzehnte lang weiterverfolgte. Er verfolgt es immer noch. Jetzt hat er ein neues Buch mit dem Titel „Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly“. Wir sind gleich zurück. Das ist FRISCHE LUFT.
(SOUNDBITE OF THE MUSIC)
GROSS: Das ist FRISCHE LUFT. Und falls Sie gerade dabei sind, mein Gast ist der Musikkritiker und Reporter Jim DeRogatis. Er brachte die Geschichte zusammen mit seinem Schreibpartner Abdon Pallasch über R. Kelly und seinen sexuellen Missbrauch, seinen Angriff auf minderjährige Mädchen. Er hat ein neues Buch über zwei Jahrzehnte dieser Geschichte herausgebracht. Es heißt „Seelenlos: Der Fall gegen R. Kelly“.
Welche Fragen zu R. Kelly sind noch offen, auf die Sie gerne Antworten hätten?
DEROGATIS: Ich würde gerne wissen, wie Clive Calder, der Präsident von Jive Records; wie Ed Genson, der Anführer des Verteidigungsteams; wie die Manager und Konzertveranstalter, die mit Kelly zusammengearbeitet haben, wie sie sich selbst im Spiegel betrachten. Viele von ihnen haben Enkelinnen und Töchter. Und wie – sie wissen, was er getan hat. Aber sie – ein Auge zugedrückt, ist nicht genau, aktiviert – aktiviert durch die Weigerung, den Soßenzug entgleisen zu lassen, erlaubte diesem Mann, weiterzumachen, weil es Geld war.
Es war Geld, das es ihm erlaubte, diese Mädchen auszubeuten. Und der einzige Grund, wissen Sie, dass ihm vielleicht ein Moment der Abrechnung bevorsteht – und ich sage vielleicht, weil er noch nicht vorbei ist – ist, dass ich, wie er vor ein paar Monaten in seinem Beichtlied „I Admit“ sang, pleite bin -eine Legende.
Wenn er jetzt im Bundesstaat Illinois vor Gericht gestellt oder auf Bundesebene angeklagt wird, dann nur, weil er pleite ist.
GROSS: Können Sie für uns kurz zusammenfassen, wie die Dinge jetzt mit R. Kelly und den Anklagepunkten gegen ihn stehen?
DEROGATIS: Also, gerade jetzt, heute, sieht sich R. Kelly im Bundesstaat Illinois mit 21 Fällen von kriminellen sexuellen Übergriffen mit vier Opfern konfrontiert, von denen drei kooperieren. Aber das andere ist ein Videoband von ca. 1999, 2000. Es gibt eine bundesstaatliche Grand Jury – zumindest eine – die im Northern District of Illinois sitzt. Einer saß im Southern District von New York. Die bundesstaatlichen Ermittlungen werden vom Heimatschutzministerium, dem FBI und dem IRS geleitet. Ihre Anklagen schauen mehr darauf, worum es in dem Buch geht – 30 Jahre Sexhandel, 30 Jahre Behinderung der Justiz. Ob diese Anklage erhoben wird, werden wir sehen.
GROSS: Hat das Verfolgen dieser Geschichte, der R. Kelly-Geschichte, Sie zwei Jahrzehnte lang dazu gebracht, die Geschichten anderer Musikstars zu überdenken, die angeblich Beziehungen zu jungen Mädchen haben?
DEROGATIS: Weißt du, es gibt sicherlich eine lange und unwürdige Geschichte von männlichen Superstars in der Musik, die Frauen schlecht behandeln. Es beginnt vor Frank Sinatra und geht weit nach der Ryan Adams-Story weiter, die kürzlich in der New York Times veröffentlicht wurde. But I don’t – I think what’s unique, Terry, about Kelly is, even as an ardent student of musical history, there is not a body count of 48 women whose names I know for anyone else we can name, not Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin or Jerry Lee Lewis or anyone. I think this is truly a predator who happened to be using the guise of pop-music superstar the way some priests have, the way some teachers have. It’s truly a singular case.
GROSS: You express your concern in the book that while you’re reporting the story, while more and more evidence is coming out that R. Kelly is a predator, that many critics are continuing to review his music in a vacuum, in a kind of cultural vacuum, in the sense that they’re not putting it in the context of the allegations against him. I’d like you to talk about that a little bit because I think that gets to a very complicated question for everybody who reviews and for listeners, too, you know, and for viewers of TV and movies and readers of books – like, does the art stand independent from the person who made it and what they’ve done that might be very bad in their own life?
DEROGATIS: Yeah. Well, you know, the professor side of me has looked at all the greatest philosophers of criticism – Oscar Wilde to H.L. Mencken to the late Lester Bangs – and I think that 99% of the time, the ideal of separating the art and the artist is a noble one. And certainly, we wouldn’t want to impose a moral litmus test on every creator of any piece of art we consume.
And then I think about having this long conversation with Roger Ebert in the middle of all this, about “Triumph Of The Will” and how there is no way to watch that film by Leni Riefenstahl and just talk about the incredible cinematography, without talking about hundreds of thousands of young men who were about to set Europe on fire and try to wipe out populations of people.
GROSS: These were propaganda films that she made for the Nazis.
DEROGATIS: The propaganda film of all time, “Triumph Of The Will,” made for the Nazi regime. “Birth Of A Nation” is similar. The lasting legacy, to me, as a critic, from #MeToo and Time’s Up, is going to be us having to look at when it’s impossible to separate the art and the artist. And me, as a professor or critic, I say there’s no right or wrong; we just have to always, each and every one of us, consider the context.
And if you can continue to take pleasure in a Woody Allen film and I can’t, or vice versa, or I can really still enjoy “Midnight In Paris,” but I cannot watch “Manhattan” with the accusations made against him by his daughter – you know, I don’t think there’s a right or wrong, but I think if we take art important – as something important, as the most important thing in life – certainly, that’s how I look at music – I think you have to consider these things.
GROSS: Can you listen to R. Kelly’s music now?
DEROGATIS: No, no. And I have done it strictly – it sounds like hyperbole – I’ve done it in the same way I had to watch that videotape; I have got to do this to tell this story right. But no, it triggers me in a way that it triggers these women. I mean, they all have told me, I am at a backyard barbecue, I am in church, I am at a relative’s high school graduation, and I hear this music, and it makes me physically ill. But that’s me. I don’t expect anybody else to tune it out, but I do expect you to be aware of it and of how this man has hurt so many women.
And you know, I mean, you have your morals; I have mine. I’m not going to prescribe anyone else’s, especially not when it comes to art. But I think it was wrong for so many of my critical peers, for so long, to literally give it a snide, passing – despite all that unpleasantness, R. Kelly is a genius. And I mean, literally, those words were written dozens of times – despite all that unpleasantness. You are talking about destroying the lives of many underage girls. That’s not unpleasantness. That’s a horror.
GROSS: Jim DeRogatis, I want to thank you for being on our show again, and thank you for your reporting.
DEROGATIS: Thank you, Terry.
GROSS: Jim DeRogatis is the author of “Soulless: The Case Against R. Kelly.” You can hear DeRogatis on the public radio show and podcast, “Sound Opinions,” which he co-hosts with fellow pop-music critic Greg Kot. After we take a short break, Maureen Corrigan will review a new autobiographical novel by Ocean Vuong, who emigrated from Vietnam with his mother when he was 2. This is FRESH AIR.
(SOUNDBITE OF TOMMASO & RAVA QUARTET’S “L’AVVENTURA”)
Copyright © 2019 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
While The Feds Star Witness RASHONA LANDFAIR Prepares to Testify About Being Raped And Peed On By R. Kelly, The Father Of Her Child DANA JAY (One Of Kelly’s Bodyguards) Is Still Supporting The Disgrac
By: Freelance Reporter Tammy Washington, Posted Jul 18, 2019 at 2:31 am US/Central
CHICAGO – The infamous video, which was sold as a bootleg on the streets of New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, was notorious: it showed R&B singer R. Kelly having sex with a girl and urinating on a girl, from whom prosecutors said it was hardly a teenager.
Our Scandal Media Street Committee has learned that one of R. Kelly’s bodyguards, Dana Jackson, who goes by the nickname “Dana Jay,” had a baby with victim and Feds star Witness Rashona Lanfair.
Rashona is expected to testify in court about how R. Kelly molested and urinated on her in his infamous sex tape when she was just 14.
The girl’s aunt, Stephanie Edwards – a singer and former protégé of Kelly’s who goes by the name Sparkle – testified against him in 2008. Her decision to work with investigators resulted in her being excluded from much of her family, an exile that lasted for years. On Tuesday, she said she was thrilled with the news.
“I am over the moon to finally hear that the mountain I have worked tirelessly on over the years is now being supported with the help of my niece and her parents!” she said in a statement. “Of course I fully support her and her courage!”
Dana Jay is suspected by some to be an “enabler” to R. Kelly, who may have witnessed the disgraced singer’s illegal acts against minors but looked the other way. There’s good reason to believe that Dana will face federal indictment in the not-too-distant future.
If impregnating his pedophile boss’ victims bazaar wasn’t enough for you, Dana Jay has another child by the daughter of one of R. Kelly’s other alleged victims, Ashanti McGee, who was featured in the Lifetime documentary, Surviving R. Kelly see was.
Dana is a low-level security guard from Baltimore, now residing in Atlanta, who has staunchly defended R. Kelly even after full federal charges were filed last week.
During a video interview with a supporter of R. Kelly, known by the YouTube handle “Phases The Next Level,” Dana was specifically asked if he was the father of the two children, and he refused to answer the question, instead of answering categorically, “No.”
A source from Kelly’s security team told Scandal Media that Dana is seen as a mere “wannabe” and also “an annoyance” by other members of Kelly’s circle. Copyright 2019 Scandal Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, transcribed or redistributed without the full consent of Scandal Media.
Related searches to Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape
Information related to the topic Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape
Here are the search results of the thread Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape from Bing. You can read more if you want.
You have just come across an article on the topic Sparkle’s Niece Reshonda Landfair Age Where is She Now in 2019, R Kelly Pee Tape. If you found this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much.
Articles compiled by Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com. See more articles in category: DIGITAL MARKETING