You are viewing this post: Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons And Testimony? Top 109 Best Answers
Are you looking for an answer to the topic “Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony“? We answer all your questions at the website Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com in category: Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com/digital-marketing. You will find the answer right below.
Keep Reading
Walter Veith Biography and Wiki
Walter Veith is a South African zoologist and Seventh-day Adventist author and speaker. He was born in 1949 as Walter Julius Veith in South Africa and grew up in a strictly Catholic home. Veith is known for his work in the fields of nutrition, creationism, and biblical exegesis at the Amazing Discoveries Media Department and on their international television network in North America on Galaxy 19.
He was a professor in the Department of Zoology at the University of Cape Town and taught in the Department of Medical Biosciences. During this time the department received a grant from the Royal Society London for zoological research.
After joining the Seventh-day Adventist Church, Veith rejected the theory of evolution in favor of creationism and was forced to resign from teaching at the University of Cape Town.
As a creationist, Veith speaks internationally on this and other topics. His lectures, videos, and books promote Creationist and Adventist beliefs and teachings. This includes an evangelical understanding of the Bible with a very strong commitment to the Textus Receptus and the King James Version of the Bible. Veith also promotes a vegan diet and belief in the imminent fulfillment of the biblical end times and the return of Jesus Christ.
He has written a number of books, including Diet and Health and The Genesis Conflict, which prove a biblical perspective and evence purported to support early-earth creationism. Veith is the keynote speaker for Amazing Discoveries, a nonprofit worldwe ministry based in British Columbia, Canada. Amazing Discoveries conducts seminars and streams via satellite, 24 hours a day, seven days a week on television and via satellite throughout North America and around the world.
Walter Veith Age
Veith is 71 years old in 2020, he was born Walter Julius Veith in South Africa in 1949 and grew up in a strictly Catholic home. However, it is not known when he celebrates his birthday.
Walter Veith Height
Veith is of average height and weight. It appears to be quite large judging by its photos compared to its surroundings. However, details of his actual height and other body measurements are not publicly available at this time. We are monitoring the information and will update this information as it is released.
Walter Veith Education
Veith began his education at the University of Stellenbosch, where he graduated in 1971 with a Master of Science in zoology. His diploma thesis dealt with the reproduction of dwarf chameleons. A two-year postgraduate course at the University of Cape Town followed in 1979. His diploma thesis was an autoradiographic and electron microscopic investigation of the embryonic nutrition of the teleost Clinus supercilious.
Veith also attended lectures on zoology at the Universities of Durban-Westville and Stellenbosch. His area of research is nutritional physiology, focusing on the influence of modern animal husbandry on the frequency of disease transmission to humans. Veith’s research focuses on degenerative diseases caused by improper nutrition and in particular on diseases such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, but also on fertility.
Walter Veith Family
Veith was born as Walter Julius Veith and grew up in a strictly Catholic home. Veith’s mother, a Protestant, died early of cancer. Walter was told by his religion teacher that his mother would languish in Hell “forever and ever” because of her non-Catholic faith. This prompted Veith to become an atheist at the age of ten. The entity of Veith’s parents is still unclear. It is also not known if he has siblings. We will update this section as soon as this information becomes available.
advertisement
Walter Veith Wife
Veith is married to his wife Sonica Veith. In the early 1980s, after his young son had become seriously ill and had recovered, Veith and his wife returned to the Catholic faith. However, a few years later he doubted Catholicism and through the influence of a craftsman renovating his kitchen, Veith and his wife embraced the Adventist faith.
Walter Veith Net Worth
Veith has an estimated net worth of $1 million – $5 million as of 2020. This includes his net worth, money, and income. His main source of income is his career as a zoologist and as a Seventh-day Adventist author and speaker. Through his various sources of income, Veith has been able to amass a fortune but prefers to lead a modest life.
Walter Veith Measurements and Facts
Here are some interesting facts and body measurements you should know about Walter Veith.
Walter Veith Bio and Wiki
Full names: Walter Julius Veith. Popular as: Lecturer on amazing discoveries on nutrition, creationism and last-day events. Gender: Male Profession/Occupation: Evangelist, Author, Orator, Professor, Pastor. Nationality: South African Race/Ethnicity: African Religion: Christian Sexual orientation: Hetero
Walter Veith Birthday
Age/How old?: 71 years as of 2020. Zodiac Sign: Updating. Date of birth: 1949. Place of birth: South Africa. Birthday: Will be updated
Walter Veith Body Measurements
Height/How tall?: Updating Weight: Updating Eye Color: Updating Hair Color: Updating Shoe Size: N/A
Walter Veith Family and Relationship
Father (Father): Updating Mother: Updating Siblings (Brothers and Sisters): Updating Marital Status: Married Wife/Spouse: Married to Sonica Veith. Dating/Girlfriend: N/A Children: Updating
Walter Veith Networth and Salary
Net worth: $1 million – $5 million as of 2020. Salary: To be verified Source of income: Evangelist, author, speaker, professor, pastor.
Walter Veith Books
The Genesis Conflict 2002Truth Matters 2002Diet and Health: Scientific Perspectives 1998
Frequently Asked Questions About Walter Veith
Who is Walter Veith?
Veith is a South African zoologist and Seventh-day Adventist author and speaker.
How old is Walter Veith?
Veith is 71 years old in 2020, he was born in 1949 as Walter Julius Veith in South Africa.
How tall is Walter Veith?
Veith is of average height and weight.
Is Walter Veith married?
Veith is married to his wife Sonica Veith.
How much is Walter Veith worth?
Veith has an estimated net worth of $1 million – $5 million as of 2020.
How much does Veith make?
Veith has an estimated net worth of $1 million to $5 million.
Where does Veith live?
Veith has not revealed where he lives.
Is Veith dead or alive?
Veith is alive and in good health. There were no reports that he was ill or had any health problems.
Where is Veith Now?
Veith is a South African zoologist and Seventh-day Adventist author and speaker.
Walter Veith Social Media Contacts
InstagramTwitterFacebook
Related Biographies.
You may also want to read Bio, Career, Family, Relationship, Measurements, Net worth, Achievements and more about:
Mark Finley, Dav Asscherick, Davion Taylor
Reference:
We acknowledge the following websites that we referenced when writing this article:
WikipediaIMDBFaceBookTwitterInstagram andYoutube
The secrets behind the SECRET SOCIETIES who control the world | Walter Veith
Images related to the topicThe secrets behind the SECRET SOCIETIES who control the world | Walter Veith
See some more details on the topic Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony here:
Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family …
Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Veos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and … Walter Veith is a South African zoologist and a Seventh-day …
Source: 44bars.com
Date Published: 9/21/2021
View: 7134
Walter Veith – Wikipedia
Walter Veith ; 1949 (age 72–73). South Africa · Evangelist, author, speaker, professor, pastor · Lecturer for Amazing Discoveries on nutrition, creationism, and ” …
Source: en.wikipedia.org
Date Published: 11/26/2022
View: 2710
The Dark Fantasy World of Walter Veith – Spectrum Magazine
Veith is a South African Seventh-day Adventist who was born in 1949 and was at one time chair of zoology at the University of the Western Cape.
Source: spectrummagazine.org
Date Published: 5/12/2022
View: 8882
Independent Lay Evangelist faces Accusations of Anti …
Walter Veith, a former zoology professor from South Africa who operates an Adventist independent ministry based in British Columbia, has been investigated …
Source: atoday.org
Date Published: 7/11/2021
View: 5569
Walter Veith
South African zoologist (born 1949)
Walter Julius Veith (born 1949) is a South African zoologist and Seventh-day Adventist author and speaker known for his work in the fields of nutrition, creationism, and biblical exegesis.
Veith was a professor in the Department of Zoology at the University of Cape Town and taught in the Department of Medical Biosciences. During this time the department received a grant from the Royal Society London for zoological research.[1]
After joining the Seventh-day Adventist Church, he rejected the theory of evolution in favor of creationism[2][3] and was forced to resign from the University of Cape Town.
As a creationist[4] he speaks internationally on this and other topics. His lectures, videos, and books promote Creationist and Adventist beliefs and teachings. This includes an evangelical understanding of the Bible with a very strong commitment to the Textus Receptus and the King James Version of the Bible. He also promotes a vegan diet and belief in the imminent fulfillment of the biblical end times and the return of Jesus Christ.
Veith has written a number of books, including Diet and Health and The Genesis Conflict, which provide a biblical perspective and evidence purported to support early-earth creationism.[5] He is the keynote speaker for Amazing Discoveries, a nonprofit worldwide ministry based in British Columbia, Canada.[6]
life [edit]
childhood [edit]
Walter Veith was born in 1949 and grew up in a strictly Catholic home. His mother, a Protestant, died of cancer at an early age. Veith was told by his religion teacher that his mother would burn in hell “forever and ever” because of her non-Catholic faith.[7] This prompted Veith to become an atheist at the age of ten.[8][9]
Study [ edit ]
In 1971, Walter Veith began studying zoology at the University of Stellenbosch, which he completed with a Master of Science in zoology.[10] His diploma thesis dealt with the reproduction of dwarf chameleons. A two-year postgraduate course at the University of Cape Town followed in 1979. His thesis was an autoradiographic and electron microscopic investigation of the embryonic nutrition of the teleost Clinus superciliosus. He also attended lectures on zoology at the universities of Durban-Westville and Stellenbosch.[11] Veith’s research area is nutritional physiology and focuses on the influence of modern animal husbandry on the frequency of disease transmission to humans. His research focuses on degenerative diseases caused by improper diet, in particular on diseases such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular diseases, but also on fertility.[12]
Doctrine and Religious Development
After completing his doctorate, Veith became an associate professor at Stellenbosch University and lectured in zoology until 1987.
In the early 1980s, after his young son fell seriously ill (believed to be demonic possession) and allegedly recovered with the help of a Catholic priest, he and his wife returned to the Catholic faith. But a few years later he doubted Catholicism, and through the influence of a handyman renovating his kitchen, he and his wife embraced the Adventist faith.
In his first lectures as an associate professor, he had had a student who rejected what she called the lie of evolutionism and instead asserted the truth of the biblical story of creation. He pointed her firmly to her place. Now his new faith and his own Bible studies led him to embrace that faith, which brought him into conflict with what he was teaching. Because of his lectures on alleged scientific evidence for the biblical story of creation, he was asked to leave the University of Stellenbosch.[13]
He sold his home in Stellenbosch and took a position as Associate Professor of Zoology at the University of the Western Cape. His serious misgivings about the theory of evolution were allayed by the proviso that all he had to do was research.
The university was temporarily closed due to race riots. This gave Veith the opportunity to travel to California and visit Ariel Roth, a creationist in charge of the Adventist Geoscience Research Institute, Loma Linda.[14][15] He researched evidence for the biblical story of creation and developed a series of talks to present his findings.
The following year, Veith received a one-year contract at the University of Cape Town. His creationist lectures resulted in his contract not being renewed, but he was hired in a research-only position at the University of the Western Cape. At this time, Veith began to give non-university lectures.[16] Initially, he lectured primarily to Adventist churches in the United States, then Canada, Australia, and Europe. In his nutrition lectures he promoted Adventist values such as vegetarianism and fasting. His first book was published in 1998 entitled Diet and Health.[17]
In 1995 he became professor for life and head of the Institute of Zoology, which after five years also dealt with the content of the theory of evolution. He used his position to promote his belief in creationism and to deny the theory of evolution, among other things, and found a fellow believer in these views in his colleague Quincy Johnson. In 1997 he published his findings in The Genesis Conflict.[18]
After arguments at the University of the Western Cape over their unorthodox views, Walter Veith and Quincy Johnson left the Zoology Department. Johnson joined the Institute of Microbiology while Veith joined the Institute of Physiology where he worked until 2003. With this change, their license to teach zoology was withdrawn. Since retiring from teaching physiology, Veith has dedicated himself to pastoral work.
Lectures [edit]
Veith teaches in his lectures the cornerstones of Adventism,[19] which he considers an extension of the founding principles of the Reformation, including Sola Gracia, Sola Christos, Sola Scriptura – grace alone, Christ alone, the Bible alone and a pillar of the Reformation: the identity of the Antichrist.[20] He states that Adventism grew out of Reformation beliefs that eventually passed into creeds and, along with the three angels’ messages, made five key discoveries”[21][22] that make the Adventist denomination unique:
“The doctrine of the sanctuary—the whole plan of salvation in writing. The ceremonial law that God gave to ancient Israel symbolizes the work of Jesus throughout history. As people began to unravel this plan, they began to understand Jesus’ ministry and what had happened on the day of their disappointment.
“Out of sanctuary doctrine and the Great Disappointment the great message of the Second Coming was formed, truth about the Sabbath was rediscovered, a biblical understanding of the condition of the dead was unraveled, and the Spirit of Prophecy was established.”[23]
Veith has also lectured on nutrition as it directly affects numerous degenerative diseases, including his insights into the negative effects caused by poor nutrition such as osteoporosis, arthritis and cancer. He also lectures on creationism.[24]
Veith’s View of the KJV Bible[edit]
Veith holds that some of the new versions of the Bible that have come out came from manuscripts with corruptions introduced by the Alexandrian text and that they vary and are less reliable than the majority text.[25] The Adventist Church does not hold a single KJV view,[26] although a number of Adventists continue to favor the King James version. Because of his lecture War of the Bibles in 2004, Veith was temporarily denied access to STA congregations in Germany, but was reinstated in 2010.[27]
One journal recommended Veith “to revise from the ground up future commentaries on this subject, to keep them balanced, fair and serious, or to refrain from them”.[28]
The Adventist Biblical Research Institute disagrees with Veith’s view of Bible translation.[26]
Conspiracy theories[edit]
Spectrum magazine, an independent periodical focused on Adventism, credits Walter Veith as the leading conspiratorial voice within Adventism.[29]
Without specifically naming Veith, the church’s official journal, the Adventist Review, has addressed Veith’s conspiracy theories.[30] Veith responded to the review author and further clarified his views.[31]
In May 2020, the headquarters of the Seventh-day Adventist church in Southern Africa, the Southern Africa Union Conference, issued a statement rejecting claims made by Veith that Jesus would come around or by 2027.
He has also made claims in recent DVDs that the COVID-19 pandemic is one of the signs of the imminent coming of Christ – consistent with his 2027 claim. This is not supported by the church to which he belongs.
anti-Semitism accusation
In a lecture in Nuremberg-Marienberg in October 2012, Walter Veith claimed that the Holocaust was used to “round up” Jews from all over Europe so that they could be resettled in Palestine.
The Seventh-day Adventist church leadership in Germany, Austria and Switzerland decided on November 9, 2012 that these statements were anti-Semitic and discriminatory. The church leaders took the view that they were “very close to criminally trivializing the Nazi reign of terror”[32]. In December 2012, the church leadership banned Veith from speaking in community centers, labeling his speaking engagements as “conspiracy theories” and “spiritual abuse.”[33]
However, various German Seventh-day Adventists circumvent this ban by inviting Walter Veith to larger, independent event halls.[34]
Amazing Discoveries and Walter Veith countered that the presentation was in no way meant to be anti-Semitic[35] and distanced themselves from anti-Semitism and racism. Veith blames “linguistic inadequacies” for the accusation of anti-Semitism, because German is a foreign language for him, and adds that in Germany there is “oversensitivity” to statements about the persecution of the Jews.[36] According to Amazing Discoveries, Arno Hamburger, a member of the Nuremberg City Council and first chairman of the Jewish community, is of the opinion that Veith’s statement contained no recognizable anti-Semitism.[37]
books [edit]
Something else. Vegan cuisine. More great, delicious recipes. Nuremberg: Shosh, 1993
. Nuremberg: Shosh, 1993 rediscover nutrition. The influence of diet on our health. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 1996 ISBN 3-8047-1468-4, (Also published as Diet and Health, Stuttgart 1998, ISBN 3-88763-068-8). Presents health insights from his own research and seminars on nutrition and the effects of nutrition on human health and disease
. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 1996 ISBN 3-8047-1468-4, (also published as , Stuttgart 1998, ISBN 3-88763-068-8). Presenting insights into health from his own research and seminars on nutrition and the effects of diet on human health and disease The Genesis Conflict. Amazing Discoveries, Delta BC 2002, ISBN 0-9682363-5-9. A study of the theory of evolution and the evidence of creation found in the natural world. In this book Veith discusses the biblical version of the creation account and argues in support of its veracity by claiming that the geological and paleontological data do not support gradual evolution but rather imply cataclysms, which agrees with the Genesis account.
. Amazing Discoveries, Delta BC 2002, ISBN 0-9682363-5-9. A study of the theory of evolution and the evidence of creation found in the natural world. In this book Veith discusses the biblical version of the creation account and argues in support of its veracity by claiming that the geological and paleontological data do not support gradual evolution but rather imply cataclysms, which agrees with the Genesis account. The truth matters. Amazing Discoveries, Heroldsberg 2003, ISBN 3-9809109-0-3, (original title: Truth Matters – Escapeing the Labyrinth of Error). An analysis of current religious and political developments based on biblical texts, which asserts that the Papacy, Freemasonry and the United Nations (among other institutions) are anti-Christian oriented organizations.
Publications[ edit ]
Veith, W.J. 1974. Reproductive biology of Chamaeleo pumilis pumilis with special reference to the role of the corpus luteum and progesterone. zool. Afric 9:161-183. Veith, W. J. 1979 The chemical composition of the follicular fluid of the viviparous teleost Clinus Superciliousus, Comp. biochem. physiol. 63A; 37-40 Veith, W.J., 1979, Reproduction of the viviparous teleost Clinus superciliosus. S. Afr. J Zool. 14:208-211 Veith, W.J., 1980, Viviparity and Embryonic Adaptations in the Teleost Clinus Superciliosus. Can J Zool. 58:1-12 Veith, W.J. and S.R. Malecha. 1983. Histochemical study of the distribution of lipids, 3-alpha and 3-beta hydrosteroid dehydrogenases in the androgenic gland of the cultured shrimp, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) (Crustacea; Decapoda). S.Afri. J.Sci. 79:84-85. Manie, T., Khan, S., Brozel, VS., Veith, W.J. and Gouws, P.A. 1998. Antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from slaughtered and retail chickens in South Africa. Letters in Applied Microbiology 26, 253–258. Manie, T., Brozel, VS., Veith, W.J. and Gouws, P.A. 1999. Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial flora associated with bovine products in South Africa. Journal of Food Protection 62, 615–618.
See also[edit]
References[edit]
See also 28 Basics#External Links
Independent Lay Evangelist faces Accusations of Anti-Semitism after Speaking in Germany
Adventist Tomorrow: Fresh Ideas While Waiting for Jesus, by Jack Hoehn
ADVENTIST TOMORROW by Jack Hoehn is the best-selling book published by Adventist Today, having sold over 850 copies to date (480+ in paperback and 370+ in electronic Kindle). It is read by Adventist college and university students. It is read in Canada, Australia, South Africa, Kenya and Spain, Germany, Norway, Sweden and Denmark.
Who reads Jack’s book? Jonathan Butler said it was on his reading list. Smuts Van Rooyen says he enjoys it. It was highly recommended by Pastors John Hughson and Kenneth Preston. Pastor Kevin McGill in Seattle quoted from the book in one of his sermons. Carmen Lau read the book. Jennifer Ogden, Beverly Beem, Linda Nottingham, Cherri-Ann Farquharson, and Gina Olberg all read it with positive reviews.
Even Clifford Goldstein told Jack he liked the chapter on intoxicants and got a new idea from the Not a Rib chapter, “but not much else.” (Jack accepts that this is as good a review of Cliff as he could hope for!)
You don’t have to agree with Jack to read the book either. It is important that all caring Adventists carefully consider the ideas discussed in this book. It’s up to you to decide what to do about these issues. Is there a future and a past for Adventism? And what could this future look like?
Readers who like the book say: It’s a good read. I really enjoyed it. A very valuable work. Once started, I couldn’t put it down. Very well written. An unprecedented and transformative rescue of Adventist thought. A real pleasure and a relief. Very richly added to my heart, soul and mind.
The book is well suited for individual study. It is even better as a basis for group discussions – Sabbath school classes, book clubs, classrooms, work meetings that focus on tomorrow’s challenges. After you’ve read your copy, share it with someone else or give them a copy of their own. There are 92,000 STA churches in the world, most of them should have discussions on important issues like this.
HOW TO GET YOUR COPY–
US and Canada: CLICK HERE for Amazon.com, who will print and mail you a paperback copy for $20.00 or mail you an electronic Kindle copy for $9.00. All profits go to support Adventist Today.
UK: ADVENTIST TOMORROW from www.Amazon.co.UK is available for £14.64 in paperback or £6.47 for Kindle.
Australia and New Zealand: ADVENTIST TOMORROW from www.Amazon.com.au for A$28.38 for the paperback or A$11.57 for the Kindle version.
Europe: For example, Germany has www.Amazon.de where ADVENTIST TOMORROW (in English) is available for €17.41 in paperback or €7.42 on Kindle. You should be able to do the same with Amazon. [fr/es/it].
Japan: Try www.Amazon.co.jp. with paperback priced at JPY 2,309 and Kindle priced at JPY 948.
Kenya: Some specimens have been imported into your country, contact us for more information.
Other countries: If not near one of the above sources, Amazon will ship to other countries. You can go here: https://www.amazon.com/International-Shipping-Direct and find out if a printed book can be shipped directly to you and what the shipping costs are. Electronic Kindle versions have no shipping costs.
Dr Walter Veith Replies to Criticism
dr Walter Veith responds to Reinder Bruinsma’s recent criticism in the Adventist Review.
Reinder Bruinsma recently published an article in the Adventist Review in which he castigated an Adventist lecturer who had recently visited his native Holland for his emphasis on “conspiracy theories.” He states in his article:
My country was unfortunate not long ago to be visited by an Adventist teacher who travels the world and accepts invitations on every continent to preach on the events leading up to the end of time. His approach is similar to that of bestselling author Dan Brown. The recipe seems to be: take a few undisputed facts; They then add a large number of unknown facts, drawn from obscure sources that no one can verify, and which are at most partially true; and you mix all of this until you have a potent concoction for the sensation-hungry consumer. It seems to increase the attractiveness of the resulting product when the speaker assures his audience that the official church, with its ecumenical tendencies, is failing to proclaim these precious truths. And it’s no wonder, as the church has been infiltrated by the very same forces of darkness he sought to unveil!
The recipe is as successful as it is dangerous. It results in fear. It polarizes churches. It cultivates mistrust of church leadership. It fuels the prejudice of many around us that Adventism is, after all, a sub-Christian cult. But worst of all, it eclipses the good news of the gospel message with irresponsible innuendo and speculation and unhealthy sensationalism. It was good to see the 2008 Week of Prayer readings giving a strong warning against this practice and emphasizing the signs of Christ’s return as a sign of hope! The message of Advent hope is not related to theories about secret religious societies and the seemingly ubiquitous Freemasons. The greatest sign of the end is not the spread of New Age thought or the supposed development of some form of world government, but the powerful preaching of the message of Christ’s imminent return to every nation and people group and in every spoken language on earth.
Since that article appeared in The Review, I have received a spate of letters from concerned people who are convinced that Bruinsma appeared to be referring to me in that article, and as a result spawned a spate of “conspiracy theories” about the Church became. Well, it’s true that I recently visited the Netherlands as an invited speaker, but barring unfortunate misinformation, he couldn’t possibly have referred to me (or could he have?) for the following reasons.
I never ask for invitations, so the speaker in question can’t be me because he says the speaker in question “is himself invited.” I am not concerned with sensationalism, but with facts and history well grounded in the literature and media of the time and backed up by the Bible and the Spirit of Prophecy. My sources are not “obscure” but very prominent and anyone can verify them. I have shown in my lectures that the ecumenical movement is not of God and have consistently warned against involvement in this movement, but I have never spoken of SDA involvement in this movement. Furthermore, I have never pointed my guns at the militant Church in any public lecture or forum and have consistently warned against such actions. Nor have I ever suggested a hunt for Jesuit membership or “secret societies” among church leaders. His statement: “The speaker assures his audience that the official church, with its ecumenical tendencies, fails to proclaim these precious truths. And no wonder, for the Church has been infiltrated by the very same forces of darkness that he has come to reveal! ” cannot therefore refer to me, since I have not made such suggestions in any of my series. Also, I certainly do not neglect the precious truths of salvation, but on the contrary contrast truth and error and thus bring people to a decision, the truth instead of following error. During my recent visit to Holland I spoke about the need to rekindle the Reformation. There were no lectures on secret societies, Freemasons or the New Age movement, so he could not possibly have been referring to me, if he hadn’t been wrong.
Some of the responses I received showed genuine concern about the state of the church and the apparent gap between those who want to hold on to the traditional values of Adventism and those who want to introduce a new gospel of social responsibility and religious relaxation, rather than to preaching the three angels’ messages. Some responses and information received were extremely critical of the review article author himself, even to the point of suggesting infiltration of the church.
Unfortunately, it is true that Bruinsma is known for his anti-traditionalist views and has published articles that are extremely disturbing to those who hold to the pillars of Adventism. Some have produced documents against him, accusing him of outside connections, but I would caution against such hasty conclusions, which could trigger a witch hunt within the Church. It is not our job to label anyone a Jesuit or an infiltrator within the Church. Our job is to preach the three angels’ messages, and we are to “let nothing else occupy our attention.” Sometimes it is necessary to address issues that are raised in the public sphere, as in this case, but we should not have the luxury of wallowing in the controversy raging within the Church.
This church belongs to Christ and it is he who reads hearts, not us. It is He who will spit out those who are not His; we must not spit. The Seventh-day Adventist Church is the apple of His eye, and we must not equate it with Babylon, no matter how many apostate or deceived members there may be. We cannot see the heart; How should we judge who is Aaron and who is Caiaphas? We can blame the deeds, but we must not blame the person, let’s leave that to the Lord.
Often those with phobias related to the “separate” nature of Adventism are born and raised Adventists feeling isolated in this cocoon of security. In this regard, there is what I call the “blessed curse” of being born an Adventist. What a privilege to be born into the Adventist Church, to be raised in Adventist values and teachings, to have Adventist families and friends to nurture and support, and to have been privileged to benefit from the Adventist lifestyle from childhood. But sometimes it can also be such a curse. You were born with it, it didn’t cost you anything. No severing of family ties, no rejection from lifelong friends, no alienation from the religious environment in which you grew up, no drastic change in mindset and lifestyle—you were spared that pain. The price is high, it costs everything you have, and finding Christ and His truth is precious. Even born Adventists must find this treasure themselves. It is not inherited; only the nurturing environment is inherited.
Also, you want to shout it from the roof and warn those still steeped in Babylon to step over from the other side. We are driven, called to point out the differences between Babylon and the truth to compel the people to come in. Babylon must be uncovered and the doctrinal errors of Babylonian wine illuminated in order to tear people from its intoxicating power. However, we must not confuse people with structures. There are wonderful children of God in every church and religion, but God calls them out and those who hear His voice will answer.
Many born Adventists feel uncomfortable when the doctrinal issues that separate Babylon from truth are emphasized. Why not just preach Jesus? Why not lead people to Jesus by example? Don’t all Christian churches preach Jesus? Why should I change my denomination if someone is preaching Jesus? When it comes to following exemplary people, we can emulate any philanthropist, and it would make no difference whether we became Catholics (the faith I was born into) or not. I became a Seventh-day Adventist because of the doctrine. Teaching didn’t save me, Jesus did, but without teaching I wouldn’t have known which Jesus I was following because “there are many false Christs” out there. Dear Born Adventists, “heed the doctrine” and don’t be ashamed of who you are. Don’t be uncomfortable with teachings being preached – it’s not for you; You already know it’s for you. They need it, not you, because you already have it. Teaching is the ax to chop them out of the world and bring them into His wondrous light.
What about the poor atheists out there (which I was one of) who openly deny God and despise Jesus Christ and Christians as weak, self-pitying crutch-seekers? These atheists will say that the Bible is a myth, a fairy tale written by ignorant Stone Age-type primitives. What answer will you give them; will you preach the love of jesus when they despise him? No, you’re going to preach prophecy – good solid prophecy from Daniel and Revelation – and pull the rug of their faith from under their feet. Make them wonder if God even exists, and then preach Jesus. Dear born Adventist, do not be ashamed of the prophecy that sets you apart from the world. It’s the only tool left in your toolbox to reach out to the atheists, who often became atheists (as in my case) because they were fed Babylonian wine that destroyed belief in God in the first place. There are different methods for different people. Some accept the gospel willingly and others are skeptical and need more evidence. We read this in the Spirit of Prophecy:
In today’s cities, where there is so much to gain and enjoy, no ordinary effort can interest people. Appointing servants of God will find it necessary to make extraordinary efforts to attract the attention of the crowd. And when they succeed in bringing large numbers of people together, they must deliver messages so out of order that people are startled and warned. They must use every means possible to make the truth stand out plainly and distinctly.” Testimonies, vol. 9, p. 109. (1909) {Ev 122.3}
As an evangelist, it is my duty to call people from Babylon into the ranks of the Bride of Christ. In this time that we live in, this question is being asked more and more: Why would I come out of Babylon and join the Adventist Church when there are members and leaders within the Adventist Church (Reinder Bruinsma is a case in point) who believe in the principles of agree to the ecumenical movement and promote the connection with Rome?
Am I judgmental or vindictive here? No, I am basing my judgment solely on his actions and what has come from his pen. I am not judging his heart, his motives, or his affiliations—that is not my prerogative—but I must defend my church and explain to those who have joined or are considering joining the fold why it is important that they do step in and stay in place and be “separate”, despite those who seem to preach the opposite. When issues like these are raised publicly, they need to receive a public response lest we be assumed to endorse them.
Reinder Bruinsma was Executive Secretary of the Trans-European Division from 1995 to 2001, succeeding Henk Koning as President of the Dutch Union. Henk Koning was President of the Dutch Trade Union Conference when he signed the Charta Oecumenica on January 18, 2002. Such signing cannot be done in a personal capacity, as churches and not individuals are part of the ecumenical movement. Whether Bruinsma was involved in the signing or not I don’t know, but by his silence he condoned it and he certainly didn’t undo it when he became Union President himself. Reinder Bruinsma already presented his views on relations with the Roman Catholic Church and the traditional view of the Adventist Church, including the Spirit of Prophecy, in his doctoral thesis, A Historical Analysis of Seventh-day Adventist Attitudes to Roman Catholicism (University of London, 1993 ), also published by Andrews University Press in 1995 as Adventist Attitudes to Roman Catholicism 1844-1865.
In his Summer 1999 Spectrum article he also attacked the SDA position that the Papacy is Antichrist. This position is by no means unique among Adventist leaders, as many have personally told me that this position is archaic and needs revision regardless of the clarity of Spirit of Prophecy’s statements on the matter. In fact, some argue that it is not part of our core beliefs and therefore should not be preached. However, the Spirit of Prophecy is part of our core beliefs, and because it is clearly expressed there, it becomes ipso facto part of our core beliefs, whether we like it or not. Bruinsma summarizes the anti-papal eschatological views of the Protestant world at the time of Adventism’s rise in his dissertation in the chapter entitled “Adventists and Catholics—Prophetic Insight or Prejudice.” He rightly emphasizes that the Protestant view included the eschatological view that Rome would somehow once again dominate the world stage and attempt to dominate the New World. Adventism arose in this climate, and the pioneers had the same basic prophetic perspective as was prevalent in the mainstream Protestant denominations of the time. He then proceeds to place Ellen White’s writings in this historical time frame and laments that this has placed these anti-papal views within the prophetic framework of the Spirit of Prophecy. This would make it harder for Adventists who believe in Ellen White’s prophetic writings to break free from this bias.
Such marginalization of Ellen White’s writings is typical of some of our modern theologians. The dilemma is that we cannot get rid of Spirit Prophecy because it is ingrained in our core beliefs. So the next best thing is to render it ineffective. We hear more and more often that their writings cannot be equated with those of the canonical prophets, that their writings have a homiletic flavor but cannot be used for exegesis, that their writings must be interpreted in the context of their time, and your personal views and prophetic utterances are so intermingled that perhaps their writings are best used as devotional rather than as a basis for prophetic interpretation. As one of our German theologians and leaders put it, “We cannot be dictated to by a woman with only three years of education.”
Bruinsma closes his chapter with the following statements:
While there are many aspects of Roman Catholic doctrine and practice that Adventists must strongly disagree with, honesty requires that they recognize that in most places around the world, the Roman Catholic faith has changed in ways that which they must regard as positive. Catholics are now not only allowed to read their Bibles, they are encouraged to do so. There is much spirituality in the Roman Catholic Church for Protestants to be jealous of. The Catholic Church has formally recognized the principle of religious freedom. It is not fair to suggest that these and other positive developments in the Roman Catholic Church are merely window dressing and in fact must be viewed with suspicion and seen as a clever tactic to lull other Christians to sleep while they wait only at the fortuitous moment when they will be able to wipe out other Christians, especially Adventists! In their critique of Catholic history, Adventists should seek to be more balanced than they often were, and do better than merely offer an extension of the often rather biased and inaccurate picture that many Protestants had of the medieval church in past centuries . Medieval Christianity also had its positive and beautiful sides! In addition, Adventists must be willing to recognize that modern Catholicism has changed in many ways. It particularly disturbs me to see that Adventist publications today still rely primarily on 19th-century sources to describe Catholic views and intentions. How would Adventists feel if those around them based their opinions about Adventism solely on sources dating back more than a century? Addressing this issue will no doubt be difficult and take time. Anti-Catholicism is so ingrained in the Adventist worldview that change will not be easy, even if church officials and other thought leaders would agree that a reorientation would be desirable. But in the meantime, the Church might at least choose to be less biased in its descriptions of Catholicism today.
I wonder what those positive and beautiful sides of medieval Christianity were that even history called the dark ages. If God had not shortened that time in favor of the elect, there would have been nothing left of the cause of Christ to be saved. Should Adventists recognize that modern Catholicism has changed; and what are those sources from the 19th century that contradict his statement? None other than the Spirit of Prophecy standing as a monumental rebuke of the sentiments expressed. The following statements from the Pen of Inspiration will illustrate this point:
Papacy is exactly what prophecy proclaimed it would be, the apostasy of the last ages. [2 THESS. 2:3, 4.] It is part of their principle to adopt the character that best suits their purpose; but beneath the changeable appearance of the chameleon she conceals the serpent’s unchanging venom. “We are under no obligation to keep faith and promises to heretics,” she explains. Shall this power, whose records have been written in the blood of the saints for a thousand years, now be recognized as part of Christ’s church? (GC88, 571.1)
The Church that holds to the Word of God is irreconcilably separated from Rome. Protestants were once separated from this great church of apostasy, but they have drawn closer and are still on the path of reconciliation with the Church of Rome. Rome never changes. Their principles haven’t changed a bit. She did not lessen the rift between her and the Protestants; You’ve all made progress. But what does that say about Protestantism today? It is the rejection of biblical truth that leads people to approach unfaithfulness. It is an apostate church that is closing the gap between itself and the papacy. {ST February 19, 1894, par. 4} And this is the religion to which Protestants look with so much goodwill, and which will eventually unite with Protestantism. This union, however, is not brought about by a change in Catholicism; because Rome never changes. She claims infallibility. It is Protestantism that will change. The acceptance of liberal ideas on her part will bring her where she can take the hand of Catholicism (RH June 1, 1886, para. 13).
On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in the Netherlands published an article in the Dutch newspaper Nederlands Dagblad exposing the Pope as the Antichrist of Revelation 13. In that article he quoted from an old book by Edmund Dorschler published by the Seventh-day Adventists in 1931.
On Thursday October 22, 2009, Dr. Reinder Bruinsma, responding to the article in the Nederlands Dagblad of October 21, 2009, apologized for the article and, after pointing out that the source material was from the previous century, assured the public that Adventists no longer believe this. His exact words in Dutch were as follows:
“Ik vrees dat nogal wat lezers gemakkelijk kunnen kunnen dat de sfeer van dit artikel ook nu nog op deze kerk van toepassing zal zjin. -DR. Reinder Brunsma.
The English translation is as follows:
“I am afraid that a large number of readers will think that the scope of the article is still applicable to this church [modern Dutch SDA church]. In the Netherlands, however, this Protestant church maintains good contacts with other Christian churches.” -DR. Reinder Brunsma
If Bruinsma had apologized for the way the message was delivered, that would have been one thing. But apologizing for the veracity of the message is tantamount to treason. It not only violates sound biblical exegesis and the spirit of prophecy, but also violates the consistent beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, let alone the blood of saints and martyrs who died to uphold that truth.
Called to Expose the Man of Sin—In the very time that we live in, the Lord has called His people and given them a message to bear. He called them to expose the wickedness of the man of sin, who made the Sunday law a distinctive force, who thought to change times and laws, and oppress the people of God who stand firm to honor Him, keeping the only true Sabbath, the Sabbath of creation, as holy to the Lord. –Testimonies to Ministers, p. 118. (1903) (Ev 233.2)
We are to give people the warnings contained in Revelation. But many workers are employed in a trade that disqualifies them from preaching the word and doing the very work that God has appointed them to do. The truth regarding the Lord’s Sabbath must be declared. The seventh day is to be shown as the seal of the living God. The people should be shown what they can expect from the papal power. The time has come when the Protestant churches will stretch out the hand of power that has overruled the law of God… [Here follow long quotations from Revelation 18 and brief comments.] This is the message that would have silenced Satan ( 4MR 426.1).
Her writings on secret societies and her involvement in recent events are equally clear:
This horrifying picture that John drew to show how completely the powers of earth would give themselves over to evil should show those who have received the truth how dangerous it is to associate with secret societies, or to be in any wise to connect with those who do not keep God’s commandments (14MR, 152.2).
There are those who question whether it is right for Christians to belong to Freemasonry and other secret societies. May all such consider the Scriptures just quoted. If we are Christians at all, we must be Christians everywhere, heeding and following the counsel that makes us Christians according to the standard of God’s Word (Ev. 618:1).
The picture drawn by John must relate to the book of Revelation, and according to this statement, secret societies will play an integral role in end-time events. The Freemasons deserve special mention. It strikes me as absurd to lump anyone who frames modern events within the framework of Adventist eschatology into the comfortable box of “conspiracy theorists” and compare them to Dan Brown or others of like mind. There’s a big difference between a conspiracy theorist and the Protestant legacy of sound Bible interpretation – and in the case of Adventists, the added inspiration of the Spirit of Prophecy. What a blatant disregard for not only Bible prophecy but the spirit of prophecy, let alone our Protestant heritage. I well remember my baptismal vows, which included faith in the Spirit of Prophecy, which these modern exegetes will sacrifice for a brief moment to papal approval. It’s hard for me to understand how someone can be so immersed in ostrich theology that they can even assume that the modern papacy has changed. Don’t their contemporary writings condemn them even more than their pompous medieval utterances?
On March 8, 2007, Zenit News published an article about Pope Benedict’s speech on papal primacy entitled “The World Seen From Rome-Benedict XVI Highlights 1st Century Papal Primacy Begins Audience Series on Apostolic Fathers”:
As early as the first century, the popes exercised their primacy over the other churches, says Benedict XVI. The Holy Father explained this on Wednesday at the general audience he dedicated to Pope Clement of Rome, the third successor of Peter. The Epistle of St. Clement clarifies the difference between hierarchy and laity.
The clear distinction between the ‘lay’ and the hierarchy in no way signifies a contradiction, but only the organic union of a body, an organism with different functions,” declared Benedict XVI. “Indeed, the Church is not a place of confusion and anarchy where everyone can do whatever they want at any time; Each in this organism with an articulated structure carries out his ministry according to the vocation he has received. “As far as the leaders of the communities are concerned, Clemens clearly specifies the doctrine of apostolic succession.
Benedict XVI added: “The laws that govern this ultimately come from God himself. The Father sent Jesus Christ, who in turn sent the apostles. These then sent out the first leaders of the churches, and determined that they would be followed by worthy men.”
“The Church is above all a gift from God and not a creature of ours,” the Pope asserted, “and therefore this sacramental structure guarantees not only the common order, but also the primacy of God’s gift, which we all need.”ii
According to the current Pope, the recognition of papal primacy is therefore a “sacramental structure” that makes it a question of salvation in Catholic thought. This is not an obscure 19th-century quote, but clearly shows that Rome has not changed. Accepting Jesus is a matter of salvation—not accepting an earthly deceiver who takes upon himself the privileges of Christ. Benedict also exalts the clergy and assigns them a mediating role, as the medieval church did. The Vatican website (I hope this is not considered an obscure source) states:
ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI TO THE MEMBERS OF THE PORTUGAL BISHOPS CONFERENCE ON THEIR AD LIMINA VISIT. Consistory Saturday, November 10, 2007
It is with great joy that I receive you today in the House of Peter who, by the grace of God, are solid pillars of that bridge to which you are called and which you are called to build between humanity and its supreme destiny, the Most Holy Trinity are. “I no longer live, but Christ lives in me” (Galatians 2:20). A concrete sign of this incarnation is the outpouring of the life of Christ flowing out of me into the lives of others. Denn: „Ich kann Christus nicht nur für mich besitzen, ich kann ihm nur in Gemeinschaft mit allen angehören, die sein Eigentum geworden sind oder werden werden … Wir werden ‚ein Leib‘, vollkommen verbunden in einem einzige Existenz“ (Enzyklika Deus Caritas Est, Nr. 14). Dieser „Leib“ Christi, der die Menschheit aller Zeiten und Orte umfasst, ist die Kirche.
Eine solche kirchliche Überlegenheit, die dem Klerus und dem Papst selbst zugeschrieben wird, steht im Gegensatz zu den einfachsten biblischen Äußerungen und verdient denselben Tadel, den Christus in Bezug auf die Pharisäer ausgesprochen hat.
Maleachi Martin behauptet auch, dass der Papst „der einzige lebende Vertreter Gottes unter den Menschen ist; er ist mit absoluter Autorität ausgestattet, um Gottes Erlösung zu lehren, wie sie durch seinen Sohn Jesus Christus offenbart wurde, der Gott selbst war und ist, der Mensch wurde. Die katholische Lehre besagt dies Jeder Katholik, jeder nicht-katholische Christ oder jeder Nicht-Christ einer anderen Religion, der Gottes Errettung empfängt, empfängt sie durch das geistliche Amt dieses einen Mannes in Rom und die Verdienste seiner Kirche der Gläubigen. Am 5. September 2000 wiederholte der Vatikan diese Lehre unter dem Titel Dominus Jesus’ ( Malachi Martin, Rich Church, Poor Church (New York: Putnam’s, 1984)
… Im Katechismus von McCuire heißt es: „Bischöfe und Priester der Kirche werden ‚andere Christusse’ genannt. Sie allein haben die Macht, Christus zu vertreten oder an seine Stelle zu treten, indem sie sein Evangelium predigen und sein Opfer zur Ehre Gottes und zur Errettung der Menschen darbringen.
Durch seine Weihe soll ein Priester „besondere übernatürliche Kräfte“ erhalten, insbesondere „um im heiligen Messopfer Brot und Wein in Leib und Blut Christi zu verwandeln und im Bußsakrament Sünden zu vergeben“.
Der jetzige Papst hat kategorisch erklärt, dass der ökumenische Prozess als unumkehrbar anzusehen ist und die Unterzeichnung der Charta Oecumenica durch die meisten protestantischen Kirchen ein Zeichen für den Verfall ist, der inmitten des Protestantismus eingesetzt hat. Die Charta ist eine Vereinbarung zwischen dem Katholischen Rat der Europäischen Bischofskonferenz (CCEE) und der Konferenz Europäischer Kirchen (KEK), dem protestantischen Bündnis Europas. Dieses Dokument erkennt die apostolische Sukzession an, garantiert, dass es keine Missionierung geben wird, und ändert die Botschaft des Evangeliums von der Errettung in Christus in ein soziales Evangelium der Sicherung der Menschenrechte für alle. Darüber hinaus tritt sie für eine gemeinsame Eucharistie und die Anerkennung aller Taufriten ein, wie sie in den verschiedenen Kirchen praktiziert werden. John Rogers, der ein Mitarbeiter von Tyndale und Coverdale bei der Übersetzung der Heiligen Schrift ins Englische gewesen war, wurde am 4. Februar 1555 in Smithfield auf den Scheiterhaufen geführt. Sein Verbrechen war die Leugnung der Transsubstantiation. Es ist undenkbar, dass ein Adventist dieses Dokument unterzeichnet haben könnte. Darüber hinaus setzt sich genau die KEK, die mit dem Papsttum eine Vereinbarung getroffen hat, nun für eine Sonntagsgesetzgebung in Europa ein; Dies kommt direkt von ihrer eigenen Webseite, nicht von irgendeiner obskuren Quelle.
Sie setzen sich für eine Sonntagsgesetzgebung ein und begründen ihren Standpunkt gegenüber dem Europäischen Parlament mit der Frage, “Warum der Sonntag als wöchentlicher Ruhetag in die überarbeitete Arbeitszeitrichtlinie aufgenommen werden sollte”. Sie argumentieren so:
Mehr als jeder andere Wochentag bietet ein freier Sonntag Gelegenheit, die Familie zu treffen. Mehr als jeder andere Wochentag bietet ein freier Sonntag die Gelegenheit, Freunde zu treffen, soziale Kontakte zu knüpfen und zu pflegen. Mehr als jeder andere Wochentag bietet ein freier Sonntag Arbeitern die Möglichkeit, ihren spirituellen Bedürfnissen nachzugehen. Laut einer EUROFOUND-Umfrage ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Krankheits- und Fehlzeitenproblemen in Betrieben, die an Samstagen und Sonntagen arbeiten, 1,3-mal höher als in Betrieben, die keine Wochenendarbeit erfordern. Darüber hinaus würde die Aufnahme des Sonntags als wöchentlicher Ruhetag in die überarbeitete Arbeitszeitrichtlinie endlich die Idee eines Europas der Bürger stärken, da eine große Mehrheit der Europäer die Idee eines freien Sonntags befürwortet. Es wäre daher ein konkretes Beispiel dafür, wie die EU einen spürbaren Beitrag zur Lebensqualität der Bürger leisten kann.
This is precisely what the Spirit of Prophecy predicted (conspiracy or no conspiracy), and demonstrates precisely why we should not be involved with those that war against the law of God. If that means exclusivity then so be it, because the directive is not of human devising. Even among the other Protestant churches there are still powerful voices of leaders who stand like the needle to the pole. These bright lights amongst these churches will yet take their stand under the blood stained banner of Prince Emannuel. In 1988, the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland’s Clerk to the Synod, Reverend Donald MacLean’s comment in his letter to The Times stated this:
The Ecumenical movement which you praise is the greatest disaster to affect the Christian church this century. It has reduced the professing churches of this country to a collection of bloodless, spineless and boneless organizations, which can hardly raise a whimper on the side of Christ and His Truth. Small wonder that evil progresses as it does, and spiritual darkness becomes more intense as the years go by. You appear to regard a body of professing Christians, of sober conduct, and deep spirituality of mind, as fanatical and bigoted. If this be so then the eminent men of God, such as John Knox in Scotland, John Calvin and Martin Luther on the Continent, and Archbishop Cranmer in England were bigots in their contests with the errors of Popery. We are glad to be in such company.
What an indictment to Adventists who wish to tow the ecumenical line. I have never before discussed our Church’s ecumenical relations, but in view of the nature of current circumstances and my duty as evangelist toward those who are contemplating membership in the SDA family, the time has, it seems, come to clarify a few issues. Are we as a Church involved in ecumenical relations? The answer is obviously yes. In Germany the Seventh-day Adventist Church is affiliated with the ACK and there is ample evidence elsewhere that our church is more involved than we might wish to think. Let there be Light Ministries has distributed a booklet entitled The World Council of Churches and the Seventh-day Adventist Church, which saw its first printing in 1996. I certainly do not support organizations that have nothing better to do than criticize the Church, but sometimes they do have a point, it’s what they do with it that’s problematic. The evidence presented is compelling, but sadly they then reach the conclusion that the SDA Church is fallen and has thus become part of Babylon. They quote the following Spirit of Prophecy statement where Ellen White warns that we could become a sister to Babylon:
We must as a people arouse and cleanse the camp of Israel. Licentiousness, unlawful intimacy, and unholy practices are coming in among us in a large degree; and ministers who are handling sacred things are guilty of sin in this respect. They are coveting their neighbors’ wives, and the seventh commandment is broken. We are in danger of becoming a sister to fallen Babylon, of allowing our churches to become corrupted, and filled with every foul spirit, a cage for every unclean and hateful bird; and will we be clear unless we make decided movements to cure the existing evil (21MR, 380.1).
However, Ellen White also states this:
I do not doubt your sincerity or honesty. I have written long letters at different times to those who were accusing the church of Seventh-day Adventists of being Babylon, that they were not handling the truth. You think individuals have prejudiced my mind. If I am in this state, I am not fitted to be entrusted with the work of God. But this matter has been brought before my mind in other cases where individuals have claimed to have messages for the Seventh-day Adventist Church, of a similar character, and the word has been given me, “Believe them not.” “I have not sent them, and yet they ran (2SM, 63.3).
Our Church is unique amongst all the churches in the world and God has seen to it that our structures would be thus organized that we would not become part of Babylon, even if a whole host of leaders were to apostatize and join the ranks of the enemy in trampling upon the precepts of God. Our Church is not run by a synod or a college of cardinals, but we have a bottom-up structure which means that doctrinal changes have to be voted by the worldwide Church delegates at General Conference sessions. If individuals sign the Charta Oecumenica, or even whole divisions for that matter, that does not make the SDA Church apostate, it makes those individuals apostate. The same applies to any other Church doctrine. God has blessed this Church with wonderful leaders and there are still seven thousand that have not bowed the knee to Baal. Amidst the greatest apostasy the light of these representatives of God will shine ever more brightly. A few illustrations might be in order here.
I was privileged to be part of the General Conference faith and science meetings to discuss the relevance of the six-day Creation in our modern world with its evolutionary bias. I was shocked and others were literally moved to tears to witness the level of unbelief that was often displayed by many of our leading lights. The representatives from some of our divisions produced reports that would have made our pioneers spin in their graves if they were not sleeping. Others, however, more than eclipsed these negative sentiments and I was so proud to read the report of my division to the full house of delegates confirming every pillar of our faith. I realized then that God is still ultimately in charge of His Church.
In another instance I was a camp meeting speaker at a major European camp meeting where the youth meeting resembled a heavy metal rock concert more than a religious meeting. One day I was standing outside the hall where the youth was gathering and a young West Indian man was standing outside the door. I asked him why he was standing there and he answered that his friends were inside. I asked him above the din why he was not also with his friends, and he answered that his Jesus was not in there and so he did not feel free to join them. I was amazed and a flood of pride for this young man filled my heart. We sat down and talked and as we talked, more and more young people joined us. What a wonderful experience. There is hope for our Church and the youth is going to play a great part in finishing the work. The pressure to conform to worldly standards is great and even Union Presidents have to take the brunt when they stand for principle. I have met and spoken with many of them and am proud to be a Seventh-day Adventist minister even in these terrible times in which we are living. We need not despair, God is in control and He will take His Church to the finish line. In the meantime the pen of inspiration will sustain us.
When the religion of Christ is most held in contempt, when His law is most despised, then should our zeal be the warmest and our courage and firmness the most unflinching. To stand in defense of truth and righteousness when the majority forsake us, to fight the battles of the Lord when champions are few-this will be our test. At this time we must gather warmth from the coldness of others, courage from their cowardice, and loyalty from their treason -5T 136 (1882). (LDE 180.4).
Related searches to Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony
Information related to the topic Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony
Here are the search results of the thread Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony from Bing. You can read more if you want.
You have just come across an article on the topic Walter Veith Biography, Age, Wife, Videos, Net Worth, Family, Sermons and Testimony. If you found this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much.
Articles compiled by Bangkokbikethailandchallenge.com. See more articles in category: DIGITAL MARKETING